While the US and Ukraine are reshaping bilateral relations after a jaw-dropping argument between their leaders in a televised meeting on Friday last week, Taiwan’s leading chip firm Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) on Tuesday announced that it would invest an additional US$100 billion in the US, showing a different strategy to seeking international support against neighboring authoritarian states.
The meeting between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy was organized last week to sign a mining agreement that Trump had demanded as a condition for future support for Ukraine. However, the meeting turned into a heated argument as US leaders said Ukraine should express more gratitude to Washington and agree to a ceasefire with Russia, while Zelenskiy, citing Moscow’s record of broken diplomatic promises, sought more security guarantees.
Not surprisingly, the Trump administration paused military aid to Ukraine after the meeting, a move to reassert Trump’s foreign policy centered on US interests and the “America First” principle. This deterioration in US-Ukraine relations has fueled uncertainty over the Ukraine-Russia war and deepened international concerns that Trump’s policy on Ukraine would encourage increased aggression by Russia and China.
European countries have urgently initiated a joint-force security plan and a project to mobilize more than 800 billion euros (US$863 billion) to quickly build up European defense and sustained support for Ukraine, and eventually establish defense “independence,” as the US government has suggested.
Taiwan has also faced Trump’s complaints over its low defense budget and dominance in global semiconductors. However, US politicians and academics have repeatedly underlined Taiwan’s importance to US interests, as Taiwan holds a strategic geopolitical position, plays a key role in global high-tech supply chains and has been reallocating resources outside of China.
Following President William Lai’s (賴清德) pledges to increase defense spending and increase imports from the US, TSMC announced it would build three more chip plants, two packaging facilities and one research and development center in the US.
Some view TSMC’s new investments as a compromise to Trump’s demands, and raised concerns about a weakening of Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” posing a threat to national security. However, as the firm’s overseas investments need official approval, TSMC’s most advanced technology and processes would stay in Taiwan, assuring that the nation’s lead in cutting-edge technologies would be maintained, authorities said.
Just as an increase of the defense budget could help Taiwan gain access to advanced US-made weapons that were previously unavailable for purchase, the investment is a relatively wise strategic choice for TSMC to further boost its competitive edge in the global market and deepen Taiwan’s economic ties with the US.
The US fabs would take six to 10 years to build. TSMC said that projected output of the six factories in the US would account for only 5 to 7 percent of its overall production capacity, which could be lower as the company continues to expand global operations.
Moreover, TSMC would be able to expand its own production, instead of investing in its US rival, Intel — reportedly one of the options in Trump’s plan to increase US chip production. The US factories could help it avoid tariffs and provide more direct services to its US clients. The investment could become a partnership between Taiwan and the US in artificial intelligence development and the high-tech competition with China.
TSMC’s global investments could create a win-win situation with Taiwan’s allies. Aside from the US, Taiwan should also increase its economic ties with European and Asian countries unsettled by China’s threats, ensuring that Taiwan’s national security is a common interest of Taiwan and the rest of the world.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS