The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) last week slightly lowered its economic growth forecast to 3.14 percent, compared with the 3.29 percent it estimated in November last year. Agency officials said there were two reasons for the downward revision. First, the comparison base level was high last year, when GDP growth was 4.59 percent. Second, budget cuts by the legislature would affect government investment and spending, consequently reducing GDP growth momentum.
The agency said the nation’s export-driven economy would continue to benefit from steady demand for artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled mobile phones, PCs and other consumer electronics as well as moderate demand for AI data centers and servers, which would boost Taiwan’s role in the electronics supply chain and the local semiconductor sector. As chip firms continue to invest in advanced process technologies and expand packaging capacity, coupled with the aviation industry’s purchase of more aircraft in response to travel and cargo demand, private investment would rise 6.18 percent this year, up 0.61 percentage points from the previous forecast, the DGBAS said. Meanwhile, a stable labor market with rising wages and booming cross-border travel would lead to a 2.12 percent rise in private consumption, up 0.03 percentage points from the previous estimate, it said.
However, the legislature’s slashing of the central government’s budget for this year, including NT$21.7 billion (US$659.23 million) in operating expenses and NT$17.3 billion in equipment costs, drove the DGBAS to lower its estimates for government spending and fixed investment, which would affect GDP growth by 0.15 percentage points. The additional NT$63.6 billion in budget freezes pending negotiation could affect GDP growth by another 0.2 to 0.3 percentage points, it said. The agency also warned that Taiwan’s economic growth might fall below 3 percent if the freezes remain.
The nation’s economy is bracing for more upheaval from tariffs that Washington might impose, with Taiwan a potential target for reciprocal and semiconductor tariffs. Assuming that US President Donald Trump imposes the tariffs gradually in the second and third quarters, the effect on international trade is expected to slowly emerge in the third and fourth quarters, affecting Taiwan’s exports and economic growth. In other words, pay attention to the White House’s tariff policy and the responses of other countries, as they would affect global trade momentum, inflationary pressure and supply chain deployment.
The US is Taiwan’s second-biggest export destination after China. Last year, Taiwan was the sixth-largest contributor to the US trade deficit. In the face of potential reciprocal and chip tariffs, Taiwan has responded with diplomatic overtures and plans to boost semiconductor investment in the US. The impact could also be mitigated by reducing import tariff rates on US goods and increasing imports of US agricultural products, energy and vehicles.
Politicians should serve the public good and carry society forward, while creating room for economic progress. Instead, opposition party legislators have prioritized partisan interests over the public good, adding risks to the country’s economy, which is already facing pressure from global trade tensions, while local firms look at an increasingly precarious landscape after Trump’s tariff threats rattled global markets.
Despite those economic headwinds, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are pushing for universal cash payouts of NT$10,000 per taxpayer from a tax revenue surplus, which would cost more than NT$230 billion and harm the central government’s finances. Overall, opposition lawmakers’ budget cuts and cash payment plans would weaken national fiscal resilience, while crowding out social, cultural and defense spending. Experience shows that political turmoil only deepens uncertainty and legislators’ reckless proposals ultimately harm the economy and deprive future generations of opportunity.
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means