Recently, several Facebook groups have shared a post by someone named Wayne Boyle, which says that the participation of Palauan officials in last week’s Halifax International Security Forum (HFX) in Taipei might contravene Beijing’s “one China” principle. The post emphasized that Palau should not become a bargaining chip in Taiwan’s confrontation with China. The post notes that its author is a “New Zealand journalist,” but upon investigation, the account has no prior post history aside from this article. It is possible that it is a fake account, created for the purpose of forming a “consensus” by sharing the post to other accounts and groups, thereby successfully manipulating public opinion through information warfare.
HFX is a globally renowned security conference that discusses democratic values, international security and strategic issues in the Indo-Pacific region. The forum was held in Canada in November last year, where the 2020 John McCain Prize for Leadership in Public Service was awarded to former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in recognition of her contributions.
This move triggered strong protests from China, which criticized it as an infringement of its “one China” principle. On Thursday and Friday last week, the forum was held in Taiwan for the first time, further strengthening Taiwan’s international diplomacy and highlighting China’s hostility toward the forum.
Palau is a diplomatic ally of Taiwan — the two countries have cooperated in the areas of healthcare, economics, education and more. Taiwan has assisted Palau in constructing medical facilities, dispatched medical teams to provide aid and enhanced local infrastructure through technical cooperation projects.
Furthermore, Palau has voiced its support for Taiwan in international forums, including openly advocating for Taiwan’s increased international participation at the UN General Assembly. This relationship has provided Taiwan and Palau with a certain degree of mutual trust and cooperation on diplomatic and regional security issues.
However, this widely circulated Facebook post deliberately emphasized that Palau should take a “cautious” diplomatic stance, even suggesting that Palau’s strong relationship with Taiwan has led to a drop in Chinese tourists to the country, thereby impacting its economic development. It further argues that the Palauan government should — in protecting its national interests — appropriately handle its relationship with China, rather than becoming a victim of the Taiwan Strait issue.
However, the article fails to clearly specify what kind of unnecessary political pressure Palau is facing, nor does it explain which party is engaging in said coercion and inducement. Instead, it uses vague language to lead readers into believing that Palau should not have sent officials to participate in the HFX Taipei forum — which has no real influence — attempting to sow uncertainty in the Taiwan-Palau relationship.
Taiwan and Palau’s friendship is solid, and the two countries’ official interactions and exchanges are normal diplomatic activities that should not be influenced by such vaguely positioned articles. Such narratives that easily mislead readers and create unnecessary trouble are a common tactic in information warfare. Given the presently changing situation in the Indo-Pacific region, we must exercise more caution when judging content that deliberately blurs the focus and creates a divisive atmosphere to prevent the manipulation of public opinion.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS