Recently, several Facebook groups have shared a post by someone named Wayne Boyle, which says that the participation of Palauan officials in last week’s Halifax International Security Forum (HFX) in Taipei might contravene Beijing’s “one China” principle. The post emphasized that Palau should not become a bargaining chip in Taiwan’s confrontation with China. The post notes that its author is a “New Zealand journalist,” but upon investigation, the account has no prior post history aside from this article. It is possible that it is a fake account, created for the purpose of forming a “consensus” by sharing the post to other accounts and groups, thereby successfully manipulating public opinion through information warfare.
HFX is a globally renowned security conference that discusses democratic values, international security and strategic issues in the Indo-Pacific region. The forum was held in Canada in November last year, where the 2020 John McCain Prize for Leadership in Public Service was awarded to former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in recognition of her contributions.
This move triggered strong protests from China, which criticized it as an infringement of its “one China” principle. On Thursday and Friday last week, the forum was held in Taiwan for the first time, further strengthening Taiwan’s international diplomacy and highlighting China’s hostility toward the forum.
Palau is a diplomatic ally of Taiwan — the two countries have cooperated in the areas of healthcare, economics, education and more. Taiwan has assisted Palau in constructing medical facilities, dispatched medical teams to provide aid and enhanced local infrastructure through technical cooperation projects.
Furthermore, Palau has voiced its support for Taiwan in international forums, including openly advocating for Taiwan’s increased international participation at the UN General Assembly. This relationship has provided Taiwan and Palau with a certain degree of mutual trust and cooperation on diplomatic and regional security issues.
However, this widely circulated Facebook post deliberately emphasized that Palau should take a “cautious” diplomatic stance, even suggesting that Palau’s strong relationship with Taiwan has led to a drop in Chinese tourists to the country, thereby impacting its economic development. It further argues that the Palauan government should — in protecting its national interests — appropriately handle its relationship with China, rather than becoming a victim of the Taiwan Strait issue.
However, the article fails to clearly specify what kind of unnecessary political pressure Palau is facing, nor does it explain which party is engaging in said coercion and inducement. Instead, it uses vague language to lead readers into believing that Palau should not have sent officials to participate in the HFX Taipei forum — which has no real influence — attempting to sow uncertainty in the Taiwan-Palau relationship.
Taiwan and Palau’s friendship is solid, and the two countries’ official interactions and exchanges are normal diplomatic activities that should not be influenced by such vaguely positioned articles. Such narratives that easily mislead readers and create unnecessary trouble are a common tactic in information warfare. Given the presently changing situation in the Indo-Pacific region, we must exercise more caution when judging content that deliberately blurs the focus and creates a divisive atmosphere to prevent the manipulation of public opinion.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS