South Korea has announced a ban on new downloads of DeepSeek, a Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) application, due to concerns over user data privacy. The South Korean Personal Information Protection Commission found that DeepSeek was transmitting data to ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, without user consent. This move makes South Korea the second country, after Italy, to restrict DeepSeek, underscoring the growing tension between AI innovation and data privacy regulations.
DeepSeek, one of China’s rising AI firms, developed the DeepSeek-R1 model, which is considered a competitor to OpenAI’s GPT-4. While the model boasts high efficiency at a lower computational cost, the controversy surrounding DeepSeek is not about its technological capabilities, but rather its handling of user data.
The investigation revealed that DeepSeek failed to adequately disclose how it collects, stores and shares data. Moreover, it allegedly tracked user keystrokes, raising concerns about mass surveillance. As a result, South Korea’s regulators ordered DeepSeek to halt new downloads on Feb. 15, allowing resumption only if it complies with data privacy laws.
The ban is not merely an AI privacy issue; it also reflects South Korea’s increasing vigilance toward Chinese tech influence. The South Korean government has previously scrutinized Chinese tech firms, including an ongoing investigation into Temu, a Chinese e-commerce platform, for potentially collecting excessive user data.
This heightened scrutiny aligns with a broader global trend of caution toward Chinese technology. The EU has introduced the AI Act, mandating transparency in AI data processing, while the US has raised national security concerns over AI services linked to China. The evolving AI landscape is no longer just about technological competition, but has become a battleground for regulatory compliance and geopolitical strategy.
For Taiwan, this development is particularly significant. DeepSeek has been expanding rapidly in Asia, and its entry into the Taiwanese market could introduce similar risks. While Taiwan has yet to investigate DeepSeek, the government has previously enforced strict regulatory measures against Chinese tech firms such as TikTok and Huawei to prevent the leakage of sensitive data. South Korea’s decision should prompt Taiwan to reassess its AI regulatory framework, particularly regarding Chinese AI applications and their implications on data sovereignty and information security.
Additionally, this incident highlights Taiwan’s strategic choices in AI development. South Korea has been aggressively advancing its domestic AI sector, aiming to rank among the world’s top three AI nations. To reduce reliance on Chinese technology, it is strengthening collaborations with the US and Japan. Taiwan follows a similar path, emphasizing AI semiconductor development, cloud computing and AI governance to maintain its competitive edge.
As AI technology evolves rapidly, Taiwan must balance data security with AI innovation, ensuring that it is not overly dependent on foreign AI giants, whether from the US, China or elsewhere.
The key question now is whether DeepSeek would revise its data policies to comply with South Korean regulations or abandon the market altogether. While the ban is temporary, a regulatory-compliant approach could allow DeepSeek to re-enter.
However, the broader issue remains: Would AI development continue to prioritize open innovation, or would it shift toward stricter regulatory oversight? The future of AI is not just about computing power and algorithms, but also about compliance and market trust. South Korea’s decision could set a precedent for AI governance worldwide, influencing how AI companies manage data, adapt to regulatory environment, and balance innovation with legal accountability.
Should Taiwan follow South Korea’s lead, or should it develop its own regulatory framework? Taiwan cannot afford to remain passive in this technology regulation tug-of-war. Its AI policy decisions will shape its role in the global tech landscape, determining whether it could assert its position as a leader in AI innovation while safeguarding national security and data privacy.
Elaine Ko is the chief officer of operations at the Taiwan NextGen Foundation, specializing in Taiwan’s political and international affairs, Taiwan-Korea relations and human rights.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS