The South Korean Netflix series The Trauma Code: Heroes on Call is a story about front-line medical staff who perform emergency treatment to save lives with insufficient resources, incapable or incompetent administration, and a society that misunderstands them and their duties. The drama epitomizes Taiwan’s medical system as it stands today.
At this year’s Taipei International Book Exhibition, National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) superintendent Wu Ming-shiang (吳明賢) said: “National Health Insurance has altered the medical ecosystem, and an unreasonable practitioner payment system is leading to young and new doctors’ unwillingness to take up work on the front line.”
That revealed the essence of the problem.
Despite Wu’s candor, several prominent members of the medical community have instead chosen to blame young doctors for “pursuing profit,” disregarding the more fundamental issue: When the system makes it so difficult to provide life-saving treatment, leaving it is perhaps the more rational option.
No matter whether it is emergency trauma care, internal medicine, family practice, obstetrics or pediatrics — or even fields of medicine long seen as “easy,” such as ophthalmology, dermatology and nursing — all medical workers face similar difficulties: excessively long working hours, high stress, low salaries and inadequate resources, yet they still bear society’s misplaced expectations and face the risk of medical malpractice suits.
By comparison, earnings from self-paid care services such as plastic surgery and performing routine health exams are much higher, the work hours more reasonable and the risks of being sued much lower. It is no wonder that younger doctors and medical staff are increasingly turning to those fields, unwilling to burn out within the hospital and medical system.
Wu said that last year, NTUH’s Hsinchu Branch had four outpatient surgeons who left at the same time in favor of private practice that offers monthly salaries as high as NT$700,000 — far higher than the salaries for hospital positions. That phenomenon is not only a personal choice, but is also the result of a system that does provide front-line medical staff with the respect they deserve.
The issue has never been a lack of medical staff, but rather the lack of medical professionals’ willingness to stay on. The South Korean government’s mistakes being placed on full display led to medical professionals across their nation to go on strike.
If Taiwan does not reform its misallocation of resources, it might face a situation in which more fresh medical graduates choose to go into private practice, or forgo practicing medicine in Taiwan altogether for greener pastures overseas.
If they lack reasonable salaries, resources and support, nobody would be willing to take on long-term overwork and low remuneration. That is a market choice, not an issue of ethics and morals.
Established medical professionals in Taiwan complaining and blaming younger doctors does not help to change our shared reality. They should reflect on why under our current system, saving lives has become almost not worth doing.
The Trauma Code: Heroes on Call reveals some hard truths. We need to resolve those issues. We must reform health insurance payments and improve the work environment to make it worthwhile for doctors to return to providing life-saving medical care.
Lu Chun-wei is a dermatologist and assistant professor at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Tim Smith
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS