Over the past few years, fake investment scams have flooded major social media forums and chat platforms across the Internet, creating a major social dilemma. Those ads try to lure people with promises of high profit and low risk, baiting them into joining huge investment chat rooms that ultimately convince them to unwittingly give large amounts of money to complete strangers before kicking them out and blocking them.
The government needs to respond to that issue by adding addendums to the Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act (詐欺犯罪危害防制條例), in particular by implementing real-name systems for advertising. Even then, scammers could still use overseas and shell companies to continue placing fraudulent ads, creating challenges for the enforcement of new regulations.
Shell companies are often located outside of Taiwan’s jurisdiction, making it difficult for law enforcement to trace those groups’ identities. Law enforcement once hoped to limit overseas advertising, but authorities were concerned such a move might mistakenly kill off legitimate advertising as well. That concern has led to the stalling of additional legal provisions, allowing criminal rings to continue using overseas resources to advertise fraudulent investments.
To effectively clamp down on fake investment scams, police are urging the Ministry of Digital Affairs to implement source management, demanding that platforms enact strict audits of advertisers. A feasible method would be for platforms to first restrict clients who have uploaded investment scam advertising before from ever again publishing ads on their platform.
Second, the ministry could enforce heavy penalties on platforms that have not complied with the law. Implementing those two actions would raise the costs for scammers seeking to use overseas or shell companies, effectively reducing the volume of fraudulent investment ads.
Criminal Investigation Bureau statistics showed that out of all fake investment ads published on platforms last year, Facebook came was the most-used platform, with more than 119,181 instances. Those ads often claim to be vouched for by well-known or respected company leaders, financial gurus, Internet celebrities and politicians to entice people to join the fraud group’s Line investment chat groups, which in turn fleece viewers.
Those data reveal the severity of fake investment scams and social media platforms’ insufficient response in terms of ad monitoring and management. Although new regulations have placed higher demands on those platforms, their actual enforcement has yet to be seen.
The ministry should bolster supervision of these platforms to ensure the strict enforcement of real-name systems and identity verification mechanisms for advertisers. Platforms must do their best to use technological means to identify and filter fraudulent ads, and reduce the transmission of fraudulent ads at the source, thereby helping lower the workload placed on grassroots anti-fraud personnel. Through multiparty cooperation, we can clamp down on the flood of fake investment scams, and protect the public’s property and assets.
Lin Cheng-wu is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Tim Smith
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS