Recently, a Chinese-produced beer brand has attracted attention for its advertisements in major stores in Taiwan that seemingly use the Republic of China (ROC) flag as a background. Since using the national flag typically symbolizes domestic brands, consumers that do not carefully examine the product’s label for its origin might mistakenly believe that the beer was made in Taiwan, which might impact their purchasing decisions.
That issue not only involves the protection of consumers’ rights and interests, but also highlights gaps in the labeling management of imported alcohol.
According to the Tobacco and Alcohol Administration Act (菸酒管理法), alcohol containers must clearly indicate the “country of origin” and “no false or misleading statements may be made in the labeling on the container or the external packaging or brochures of alcohol products.”
In response, the Taipei City Government said that it reached out to the company for clarification, and would handle the matter in accordance with the law to protect consumer rights and market order.
Government departments also emphasized that the Ministry of Finance has clear regulations regarding alcohol labeling, including Article 32 of the act, which requires complete and transparent labeling of products, and Article 37, which restricts advertisements containing “content that is deceptive, exaggerated, fabricated, or easily misinterpreted.” If an investigation confirms any contravention of the law, the issue would be handled accordingly.
That incident has given rise to discussions regarding politics and fair market competition. Some people say that imported products have an obligation to have strong labeling management, to uphold consumer rights and prevent imported goods from employing marketing tactics that intentionally obscure a product’s country of origin, thereby influencing consumers’ decisions.
Others are concerned about whether Taiwan should impose stricter regulatory standards on Chinese imports to prevent a lack of transparency in product information from causing an unfair market competition.
In the past, the labeling practices of other imported alcoholic beverages have sparked controversy, and that recent beer incident again highlights the severity of such issues.
The authorities have intervened in the investigation and how the matter is handled would influence the regulatory trends for the labeling of imported alcoholic beverages.
If regulations are strengthened, future reviews of alcohol labeling and advertisements might become more stringent. Conversely, if little action is taken to handle the issue, similar problems might recur, potentially undermining consumer rights and threatening the market order.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
“If you do not work in semiconductors, you are nothing in this country.” That is what an 18-year-old told me after my speech at the Kaohsiung International Youth Forum. It was a heartbreaking comment — one that highlights how Taiwan ignores the potential of the creative industry and the soft power that it generates. We all know what an Asian nation can achieve in that field. Japan led the way decades ago. South Korea followed with the enormous success of “hallyu” — also known as the Korean wave, referring to the global rise and spread of South Korean culture. Now Thailand
RSS