The Ministry of Education last week blacklisted two Chinese schools that are affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) United Front Work Department (UFWD), banning educational institutions from having exchanges or collaborating with them, and no longer recognizing qualifications from those schools.
The three schools in China are Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, Jinan University in Guangzhou and the Beijing Chinese Language and Culture College. There are reportedly no Taiwanese studying at the Beijing Chinese Language and Culture College, but about 1,500 Taiwanese are enrolled in Jinan University and about 600 at Huaqiao University, and qualifications issued by Jinan University were previously recognized in Taiwan.
The ministry said since the schools became affiliated with the UFWD, their guidelines, management and curriculum might have strayed from those of internationally recognized academic universities. The schools were also reported to have “extremely low standards” for Taiwanese applicants, and offered scholarships and tuition waivers as incentives to attract more Taiwanese students.
Taiwanese rapper Chen Po-yuan (陳柏源) said he had attended Huaqiao University, where they were taught “the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” “Xi Jinping [習近平] Thought,” “US skepticism,” and CCP loyalty and nationalism. He added that the university hoped the students would conduct “united front” work when they return to Taiwan after graduation.
The policy aroused criticism from opposition parties, but it was not highly controversial and did not stir much debate. However, it does highlight “united front” work aimed at influencing the perceptions of Taiwanese (particularly younger people) about China through “softer” powers, such as education, culture, entertainment and tourism.
Following the Sunflower movement in 2014 and China’s brutal repression of Hong Kong protests since 2019, Taiwanese millennials were dubbed the “naturally independent” generation, who identify as “Taiwanese” rather than “Chinese” and see Taiwan as an independent country. That was a setback for Xi’s “Chinese Dream,” which promised the “reunification” of Taiwan and China. That setback might have led the CCP to reassess its tactics. China ramped up its economic coercion and military intimidation, including ending preferential tariffs for Taiwanese imports, and increasing military drills and flybys around Taiwan. Last year it also issued 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” while disinformation campaigns never stopped.
The CCP is also enticing Taiwanese students with low-cost summer or winter camps in China, sponsoring Taiwanese influencers to visit China and create pro-China content, recruiting Taiwanese students to study in China using low eligibility requirements and subsidy incentives, and attracting users with content on social media. Those aim to reduce young people’s alertness to China’s authoritarian regime and aggression towards Taiwan.
The tactics seem to be working, as a survey suggested that compared with millennials, younger Taiwanese are more open and rational towards China, while another survey showed that fewer than 40 percent of young Taiwanese supported regulating Taiwanese influencers linked to pro-China unification efforts, indicating a low awareness of China’s threat.
With opposition lawmakers passing controversial bills and cutting national defense budgets, and low vigilance among young people, the government’s recent efforts, including blacklisting the universities, and President William Lai’s (賴清德) priority goal of reforming the national security legal framework and expanding the national security framework to China’s “united front” tactics, infiltration attempts and cognitive warfare seem more important than ever.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS