The Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Monday last week announced that starting in May, Taiwanese residing in Japan could write “Taiwan” in the nationality column of household registry application forms and would no longer be forced to record their nationality as “Chinese.” Meanwhile, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services are upholding their policy of allowing Taiwan-born US citizens to write “Taiwan” on official documents; not “China Taiwan” or other names that do not accord with Taiwan’s reality. These policy changes not only reflect the international community’s respect toward the recognition of Taiwanese identity, but also show the elevation of Taiwan’s global importance.
Taiwan has a democratic electoral system, an independent government body, strong economic development, and unique culture and history. These factors allow Taiwan to have an unignorable existence in the international community. However, Taiwan has long faced political pressure from China, which has forced international organizations and other nations to adopt vague or even restrictive approaches toward Taiwan in formal and official documents. To that end, Japan’s and the US’ policy corrections are a far truer reflection of Taiwan’s reality and a big step in consolidating the nation’s place as a true member of the international community. The changes are by no means a single development, but a reflection of a changing global attitude toward our nation. Over the past few years, many European countries have issued official notices to use the name “Taiwan” and not “Taiwan, China,” “China, Taiwan” or other similar misnomers. Lithuania went further by allowing Taiwan to change the name of its de facto embassy in Vilnius to “Taiwan Representative Office in Lithuania.” These positive trends show that despite China’s use of suppression around the globe, countries are increasingly willing to respect Taiwan’s identity.
National identity has long been a point of discussion in Taiwan. Surveys show that Taiwanese increasingly recognize themselves solely as “Taiwanese,” not “Chinese” or both. That mutually echoes the international community’s trend of recognizing Taiwan. When foreign governments in their official documents acknowledge the name “Taiwan,” it has a massive significance for national recognition and helps establish a stronger internal consensus on identity. The change does not stop at the personal level, but also impacts entrepreneurial and other international exchanges: When Taiwanese businesses register overseas, using the name “Taiwan” would certainly help raise awareness of their brand name. Taiwanese who study or immigrate abroad, or who marry foreigners, can use “Taiwan” on their household registry or official documents. That is an important guarantee of national identity and legal rights.
Many countries in the past took vague stances on Taiwan’s official name to avoid angering China. However, when major world economies such as Japan and the US start respecting the choices of Taiwanese, it has a demonstrable effect on other nations. In the future, countries in Europe, Southeast Asia and perhaps even international organizations might be brought along by this trend and correct their naming methods regarding Taiwan. It is also a clear indication to our government that it should actively seek more global support. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as well as our consular offices and diplomatic outfits overseas, could use those policy changes to advance and promote Taiwan’s participation in international organizations, and to properly guarantee the rights and identities of Taiwanese overseas.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University and chairman of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Tim Smith
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
RSS