The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.”
This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan.
Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022 during the administration of former US president Joe Biden, but it was reinstated after the removal triggered complaints from Beijing.
The latest version published on Thursday last week, three weeks after US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House, suggests a new US approach to supporting Taiwan’s international engagement.
The previous fact sheet said that Washington “will continue to support Taiwan’s membership in international organizations where statehood is not a requirement,” while the new version no longer mentions statehood, but says that the US would “continue to support Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations, including membership where applicable.”
The US Department of State simultaneously added sharper phrasing to the fact sheet of US-China relations, saying: “China has increasingly attempted to manipulate and subvert international organizations, including the UN and various regional fora, as tools to advance CCP [Chinese Communist Party] goals globally … and advance its interests at the expense of the US and US allies and partners.”
It also says that the US would work “to deter China’s aggression, combat China’s unfair trade policies, counter China’s malicious cyberactivity, end China’s global trafficking of fentanyl precursors, mitigate China’s manipulation of international organizations, and promote accountability for China’s violations of human rights within China and around the globe.”
The revised fact sheets show that the Trump administration considers China to be the biggest threat to the US’ global interests.
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, in a meeting last week with NATO members about negotiations to end the Russia-Ukraine war, said that the US government was no longer primarily focused on European security and that European nations should spend more on defense to counter Russia, as it makes more sense geographically for the US to invest in allies and capabilities in the Pacific to deter China.
Despite Trump triggering global concerns and diplomatic tensions with his new tariffs, including threatening to put tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors, the US Department of State in its new fact sheet has positioned Taiwan as “a highly advanced economy, and a key link in global manufacturing supply chains,” and added references to highlight Taiwan’s cooperation with the US in technology projects.
While the “today Ukraine, tomorrow Taiwan” skepticism has escalated due to the talks to end the Russia-Ukraine war without inviting representatives from Kyiv, the new fact sheet reveals an endorsement of US-Taiwan partnership.
Facing an changing international landscape, President William Lai (賴清德) has announced a plan to increase defense spending to 3 percent of GDP to boost Taiwan’s self-defense, and has also called for strengthening cooperation with the US and like-minded nations to build “non-red” supply chains that would contribute to global security and prosperity.
With its strength in technology and its geographical significance in the first island chain, Taiwan must work to “be a chess player, not a chess piece.”
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS