Londoners have been debating an expansion to Heathrow Airport for decades. Opposition has gotten so heated that a former mayor and later prime minister once pledged to lie down in front of bulldozers to stop it.
And yet, across all the years of theatrical debate, the case for adding a third runway to the UK’s busiest airport has only gotten stronger.
Could this British government finally be the one to get it done?
British Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves has promised to do so. To succeed where her predecessors have failed, she would need to once again make the case to the public — and show the competence and forbearance needed to see the project through.
Start with the basics. Heathrow Airport — which handles more than one-quarter of the UK’s exports by value, 60 percent of its air freight and more than 80 million passengers annually — is at full capacity and has been for decades. That congestion chokes commerce and constrains the country’s potential. It means fewer routes, higher airfares, slower logistics, weaker connections with other major cities and ultimately reduced economic growth.
It also hinders London in the fierce competition among global hubs for talent and trade. Long-haul flights, for freight and business passengers, are key to connecting markets in Asia, the Middle East and North America. China, France and the Netherlands have all expanded their hubs; Dubai now beats Heathrow in annual passenger traffic. By 2050, Heathrow might lose out on about 100 million passengers a year, with all the missed connections and opportunities that implies.
An expansion would not transform that picture overnight, but the benefits would be pronounced. A third runway would increase Heathrow’s capacity from about 480,000 flights a year to about 720,000, allowing total passengers to rise to perhaps 140 million. It would create, by one estimate, 100,000 jobs and boost GDP by 0.43 percent over two decades. Cheaper fares, fewer delays, improved supply chains and daily access to dozens of new markets would follow.
However, perhaps a more important benefit would be symbolic. After the self-harm induced by Brexit and following several recent public-works debacles, the UK badly needs to show that it can still act with ambition. An expanded Heathrow should not only widen the gateway to London’s intellectual and commercial assets, but also signal renewed confidence to wary investors after years of chronic indecision.
What are the drawbacks?
Noise and traffic are among the chief complaints, but as a government report found in 2015, prudent new measures — such as banning night flights, enforcing a “noise envelope” and establishing new traffic-management procedures — could mitigate many of those concerns and even mean improved quality of life for neighboring communities.
Opponents also cite environmental concerns. Yet aviation accounts for just 8 percent of the UK’s emissions, which in turn are a negligible fraction of global emissions. More to the point, rejecting expansion would simply divert flights to Paris or Amsterdam, outsourcing carbon rather than reducing it. Constrained capacity also means more planes circling, wasting fuel as they wait for landing slots.
It is worth emphasizing, finally, that technology is already mitigating such problems. Modern aircraft are quieter and more fuel-efficient than ever. Ground transportation, which accounts for a big portion of local emissions, is transitioning to electric. Advances in sustainable aviation fuel and other technologies might make air travel even cleaner. Enlightened policy — such as giving preference to airlines with lower emissions for landing slot allocations — can speed that transition.
All of which is to say that the case for expanding Heathrow remains overwhelming.
However, ultimately, the question is about more than economics. It is about whether the UK still wants to be an open and ambitious country, and whether London still wants to be the global city of tomorrow.
The British government should have a ready answer.
The Bloomberg Editorial Board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
RSS