Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping global power dynamics and those of us in the Global South — from Africa and the Caribbean to Southeast Asia and South America — must seize this moment to advance a community-driven approach to the ascending technology.
Low and middle-income countries (LMICs) stand at a crossroads with AI: It could become a mechanism for asserting our sovereignty and delivering inclusive prosperity, or the latest tool of colonization and exploitation. For centuries, our labor, natural resources and knowledge systems have been used to fuel progress in the Global North. The development and deployment of AI could follow that pattern, leaving LMICs without a stake in the technologies that would underpin our collective prosperity and ability to thrive.
However, LMICs have an opportunity to avert that outcome. We already have the talent, resources and vision to ensure that AI meets our needs. With increased coordination, investment in distributed computing and grassroots innovation, we can establish a fairer technological order that creates value for Global South communities, strengthens their agency and solves the most pressing challenges facing the planet.
Similar to colonial economies, the tech industry is fundamentally extractive. Modern AI systems, whether built by OpenAI or Meta, rely on data labeled by people in LMICs, but the Global North retains control of the industry and its profits, relegating Global South populations to the role of passive participants with high usage rates, rather than as innovators or equal actors.
Moreover, an estimated 2.6 billion people — one-third of the global population — are digitally unconnected and thus unaccounted for in the training of large language models such as the one powering ChatGPT. That reinforces Western-centric worldviews that dismiss our challenges, erase our histories and stifle our potential.
Unless we take urgent action, the Global North would continue to dominate AI and develop new forms of economic and cultural dependency, widening the chasm between those who shape the future and those who are shaped by it. To move beyond colonial patterns of dependence, we must harness the potential of our youthful, digitally native populations, rather than chasing the largest models or building supercomputers. In that sense, the absence of legacy infrastructure, often framed as a barrier to innovation, is actually our biggest strength. Unburdened by outdated systems and rigid processes, we can build lean, purpose-driven data architectures that align with our needs and principles of data sovereignty.
Converting scarcity into innovation begins with education. That could mean introducing mandatory coding classes at schools or creating AI literacy programs to build a digitally fluent workforce. In Vietnam, for example, children are taught to code starting in third grade.
Developing local foundation models and open-source deep-tech tools, such as Amini’s Earth Science Foundation Model or Lelapa AI’s Vulavula, would be equally important. That requires maximizing resources and harnessing the benefits of Global North models while moving beyond them — similar to how DeepSeek challenged OpenAI’s dominance by focusing on efficiency instead of large-scale computing.
Embracing global technologies does not mean accepting them without question — we must also be prepared to create our own innovation ecosystem. Government programs, tax policies and other measures are critical for supporting bottom-up initiatives in LMICs. Singapore has established one of the world’s most successful start-up ecosystems partly through targeted investment and economic incentives.
Even as we chart our own path, our communities and technologists should engage in efforts to shape global AI ethics, localization and governance, which requires establishing meaningful, equitable and collaborative partnerships. And we should not hesitate to forswear initiatives that undermine our freedom to develop and use locally relevant technology. For example, the “green AI” and “frugal AI” movements imply that our developers cannot be trusted to make sustainable choices. However, the high adoption rate of localized technologies such as Edge AI Foundation (formerly tinyML) in African countries shows that locally applied AI can create outsize, sustainable value at home and globally.
LMICs must act collectively to determine the best way to develop shared AI infrastructure and pool resources. To create a robust, secure and inclusive ecosystem, some countries can host data centers, while others can build distributed computer nodes and processing centers. Resources must likewise be shared among the countries producing, transforming and buying data, backstopped by targeted government initiatives that call for using local, rather than global, computational power and resources. Such a collaborative framework requires open dialogue, knowledge-sharing and mutual support.
The question was never whether we in the Global South can “catch up” with the Global North’s AI dominance; it is whether we would use the technology as an equalizer to build a better world. LMICs have already started down this path, which suggests that the real AI revolution is to unfold in Accra, Sao Paulo, Nairobi and Jakarta, not in Silicon Valley. That is how it should be, because a data-rich, community-driven and inclusive AI ecosystem in the Global South benefits everyone.
Kate Kallot is the founder and CEO of Amini.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
RSS