A new wave of online discussion has emerged regarding the Ministry of Culture’s Culture Points cash handout program intended to encourage young people to engage in cultural activities.
The new model for supporting Taiwan’s cultural and creative industries is a quality policy that would encourage, promote and cultivate good reading habits among young people. Even if the points are not used to purchase books, they can be used to attend cultural and artistic activities.
The program should not be approached with an attitude of skepticism, imagining all the ways young people might choose to spend their Culture Points, nor should people absurdly question whether the points should be spent on books.
When a policy is first implemented, it should come complete with a set of supporting measures. To prevent some teenagers from spending their Culture Points on products or activities unrelated to culture and the arts, the target audience for the points should have been clearly defined from the start.
In response to those who have already raised concerns about the issue, the ministry should re-evaluate the situation. It must complete a thorough review and verify relevant businesses and other procedures before rolling out a newly adjusted policy.
As for some legislators’ recent obsession with cutting or freezing budgets related to culture and the arts — particularly those from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — do they not want to support and encourage young Taiwanese to read?
KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has a doctorate in international relations from Jinan University, while TPP Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) holds a master’s degree and a doctorate in law from Cornell University. They both obtained advanced degrees, so is it not strange that they seem unwilling to help give the future leaders of our nation the opportunity to read?
Hung Yu-jui is a translator and Japanese-language teacher.
Translatedby Kyra Gustavsen
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press