During the Martial Law era, the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) had branches controlling the military, the police, the public sector and schools at every level.
This included the household registration system, for which police officers served as supervisors at every office. The purpose of integrating the police and the household registration system was to gather people’s personal information to put them under the KMT’s complete control.
Recently, a recall petition participant in Hualien was approached at his home by a household registration officer who asked to confirm his identity. This incident revealed that the intention behind the KMT’s plan to push through amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) — which, if passed, would require petitioners to provide a photocopy of their ID card — was to incite fear.
The KMT’s version of democracy is false. Recall petition participants should be free from the fear of their identity being exposed.
It is nearly impossible that the home visit in Hualien was the officer’s own idea. It must have been an order given by a supervisor with the approval of a superior who allowed the subordinate’s ridiculous behavior.
In Nantou, a brewery asked a civic group collecting signatures to recall KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) to leave, saying that it had to maintain “political neutrality.”
Careful examination is required to determine which local governments are failing to maintain administrative neutrality, treating public servants as political tools as if Taiwan was still a one-party state in the Martial Law era.
The public sector’s interference in the civil society recall campaigns is meant to generate fear among the public and initiate democratic backsliding.
The Hualien household registration officer’s home visit was a contravention of human rights and constitutes voter coercion. It should be treated seriously and those responsible should be held accountable. It must not happen again, or Taiwan’s democracy, rule of law and human rights could all be compromised.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Fion Khan
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS