About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future.
A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press and freedom of expression. Even former Chinese premier Li Keqiang (李克強) said that when he was Chinese Communist Party (CCP) secretary for Liaoning Province, he created his own reference model by looking at rail cargo volumes, electricity use volumes, bank loans and other data — not Beijing’s official economic indicators — to form a clearer and more accurate grasp of the province’s economic development.
Beijing still staunchly maintains that its official economic growth rate is above 5 percent, but an assessment of the economic situation among ordinary Chinese can be made by looking at the plummeting number of marriages. It is almost impossible to describe how dire the situation is.
It is not rocket science. People do not tend to get married if they do not have enough money and it is difficult to start a family without the ability to support one.
The most stinging aspect is that Chinese are living a miserable existence, yet the CCP is busy wasting resources on military adventurism against neighboring countries. Every day, it sends military aircraft and vessels to harass Taiwan, Japan and the Philippines.
If the CCP stopped wasting all of that money and instead used it to help young Chinese start families or set up businesses, it would be much more beneficial for them.
Would the CCP ever consider doing that?
Huang Tzu-wei works in public service.
Translated by Tim Smith
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS