As world leaders throw around threats about ending the ceasefire in Gaza this week, Palestinians are surveying the rubble of their homes and praying that it holds. US President Donald Trump’s suggestion that “we just clean out” the people from Gaza, and send them to live in Jordan and Egypt, has been widely condemned around the world, but my experience suggests that he would not have been the only leader thinking it.
Behind his words lie a number of assumptions, the biggest of which is that nobody would want to stay in Gaza. Aid agency workers have described a hellscape.
In a briefing on Jan. 30, Maha Khatib, the health coordinator of the International Rescue Committee, described the healthcare system as “completely destroyed, collapsed.”
What Palestinians need immediately are medical supplies, water and food, she said, but what they also need is “long-term action” for life to be possible in Gaza.
If Trump were to get his way, it would not be the first time that people have been moved because of a war. During the 1992 to 1995 conflict in Bosnia-Herzegovina 2 million people were forcibly displaced; more than 2 million are still internally displaced within Iraq.
It would also not be the first time that people were moved as a purportedly well-meaning emergency response strategy. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, residents of flooded New Orleans were corralled on to buses and distributed across other states as “internal refugees,” in a brutal act that reminded some of a time of slavery.
Often disaster contractors like to work with what I call the “Mars model” of humanitarian rebuild: as if they were colonizing a planet. They would prefer it if there were no humans to get in the way with their messy demands, just rubble to grind down and roads to lay.
Disaster capitalism is rife because there are huge sums of money to be made in the aftermath of war. The “Mars model” has no truck with ideas of homeland; the connection between a person and the soil beneath them.
My repeated experience after environmental disasters is the movement of whole communities into temporary residences elsewhere, which causes the complete fracture of their lives and communities. While they are gone they can only hope that the appointed contractors are behaving with an ethic of care — not something they can always rely on.
A report published three years after the 2007 floods in Hull, England, found that “many people had to cope with the double trauma that occurs when the first disaster [the flood] is compounded by a secondary disaster in the form of poor treatment from the various companies and agencies that are supposed to be helping with the recovery.”
There might be a humanitarian ethos and genuine safety concerns underlying it — as when I witnessed the moving of survivors out of earthquake-hit “red zones” in Christchurch, New Zealand, in 2011 — but the uprooting can still cause long-term problems.
The damage that those returning to Gaza are finding has been described by some as “total destruction,” but such rhetoric risks adding weight to the argument for “cleaning out.” It is easy to make the case that nobody would want to live in a place when it is so hard to see what once was there, but love for a place is about so much more than what can be seen.
Humans around the world, regardless of culture or creed, do remarkably similar things when they return to their destroyed place — “sentimental” acts like tying flowers to traffic cones and crane arms. In Italy and New Zealand after devastating earthquakes, I witnessed community cook-offs, vigils, laundries reclaimed and spaces carved out for daycare for toddlers. Usually, somebody starts selling from a coffee truck — all things that slow down a work program and get in the way of the engineers and disaster capitalists.
Physical “recovery” prioritizes roads, water, sewage and power. It is not wrong to — with a lack of hygiene comes the risk of disease — but the very first thing that humans want to do, wherever I worked in the world, is to find and then bury the dead.
Gaza’s civil defense agency estimates that there are more than 10,000 bodies still lying under the rubble, and no community can be truly rebuilt on a mass grave, but the bones are in the way of the roads that must be built, so many families will be condemned to an ambiguous loss which means they never truly rest again.
US envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff last month suggested that it would take 10 to 15 years to rebuild Gaza. Of course, rebuilding at all might depend on what Israel would tolerate. Then, any physical build would be derailed by constant setbacks — tensions, politics and greed, and also a steady stream of emigration. Disaster and conflict aftermath literature has described the kind of migration that happens when people just cannot survive in the place they love.
Trump might see his clean-out, but it will be a slow one — the young sent away to study or to make money somewhere else, and the old leaving because they cannot stand the noise or the risk or the tensions.
The truth is, it is not impossible to rebuild Gaza — if Israel allows it, and the rest of the world has the will. Mothers interviewed last week said they would live in tents for ever, as long as they can continue to live on that soil, but tents will not be enough. As well as urgent food, water and medicine, along with long-term infrastructure and rebuilding work, the people of Gaza need help, time and space to recover.
Mahim Qureshi, a vascular surgeon who worked in al-Aqsa hospital in Gaza in April and October last year, says that what shocked her most was that the children have lost their startle reflex after hearing bombs dropping for so many months. She talks of an intergenerational impact that would last for decades. Alongside the water bowsers and operating theaters and bakeries, there need to be places and support for those children to very slowly and partially heal.
When working in the aftermath, you learn to take one day at a time and to celebrate each tiny step forward. You cheer at the coffee truck and the flowers shoved in traffic cones. To return to a place of “total destruction” and to stay there is one of the bravest things I ever get to see.
I pray that the world supports this work and resists the lure of the “clean-out,” but for children to flourish again in Gaza, it will take the biggest diplomatic effort the world has ever seen.
Lucy Easthope is an adviser on disaster response and recovery, author of The Recovery Myth, When the Dust Settles and coeditor of When This Is Over: Reflections on an Unequal Pandemic.
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS