A Chinese person proudly said: “From Chinese physicist Yu Min (于敏) to Chinese businessman Liang Wenfeng (梁文鋒) — back in the day, we developed hydrogen bombs. Today, we’ll do the same with AI.”
Who is Yu? He is known as “the father of the Chinese hydrogen bomb.” China’s first atomic bomb in October 1964 successfully detonated under Chinese physicist Deng Jiaxian (鄧稼先) and his team. Three years later, in October 1967, a research team led by Yu developed China’s first-ever hydrogen bomb. However, during the Cultural Revolution, the facility where those bombs were developed — Plant 221 in Qinghai Province — was politically persecuted, and Yu found himself in significant danger. He even faced death threats.
How did Yu survive? According to Deng’s wife, Xu Luxi (許鹿希), the relationship between China and the US was thawing at the time due to “ping-pong diplomacy.” Chinese theoretical physicist Frank Yang (楊振寧) in July 1971 returned from the US to China to visit his relatives and reunite with old friends, Deng being one of them. Then-Chinese premier Zhou Enlai (周恩來) summoned Deng to Beijing, and Yu was also fortunate enough to be called upon and saved from the Cultural Revolution. From that point on, the Red Guards were unable to persecute the scientists at Plant 221.
Although Deng invented China’s atomic bomb, his family and colleagues were persecuted by the Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution. Deng, who had studied in the US, found himself in danger. Yu said that the so-called “Gang of Four”— Mao’s main radical allies at the time — had plans to eliminate all of the scientists involved in nuclear weapons development. Among them, explosives expert Qian Jin (錢晉) was persecuted and killed.
While the Chinese scientists were extremely intelligent and successful in the field of scientific research, they were clueless in the realm of politics and failed to see the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) malevolent nature.
In the words of physicist Albert Einstein, a man “must acquire a vivid sense of the beautiful and of the morally good. Otherwise he — with his specialized knowledge — more closely resembles a well-trained dog.”
The same can be said for those Chinese scientists, because the “motherland” to which they are so loyal lacks freedom, democracy, human rights and rule of law — the CCP’s regime is akin to that of a feudal dynasty. Therefore, it can be said that Liang — the founder of the Chinese artificial intelligence company DeepSeek — also “resembles a well-trained dog.”
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
RSS