While global tech stocks last month were rattled by the launch of Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot model DeepSeek R1, which claims to have been made at a low cost using less technologically advanced chips, the app has been banned by a growing number of countries over national security concerns, highlighting a new and dominant challenge Western democracies face with Chinese advanced technologies.
R1, which seemingly could match the performance of leading US AI models at a fraction of the cost and with free access, was launched on Jan. 20, the day US President Donald Trump was inaugurated, and a day before Trump announced a US$500 billion investment in Stargate, a US AI infrastructure project. The new app has been praised by Chinese officials and media as a symbol of the country’s breakthrough in AI tech, and was widely seen as an antagonistic response to the US’ tightened sanctions on exports of high-end chips and devices to China.
However, significant concerns regarding quality and cybersecurity have been raised about R1.
Industry analysts found that DeepSeek’s capital investment in hardware was at least US$1.6 billion, with operating costs estimated at US$944 million, much more than its claimed total cost of less than US$6 million. It even excluded money spent on prior research and ablation experiments on system architectures, algorithms and data.
Industry analyst firm SemiAnalysis found that DeepSeek has 50,000 high-end Nvidia Hopper graphics processing units, far more than the company initially reported. DeepSeek said it used old, lower-end Nvidia chips for its AI models. It was also proven that some of R1’s performance were based on existing models developed by Western firms and that it had stockpiled components before the US’ export curbs were implemented.
Furthermore, international cybersecurity firms found that R1 contains code capable of transmitting user data and sensitive information to China, and that its platform is vulnerable to data leakage and falsification. In less than a month since its launch, the app has been banned for use in government agencies in Italy, Australia, South Korea, Taiwan and Texas.
DeepSeek has also been criticized for providing biased data, especially those related to China. For example, it did not answer questions about Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and did not give meaningful responses when asked about China’s human rights issues or issues such as the Tiananmen Square Massacre.
Similar to other Chinese apps, such as TikTok, and RedNote (Xiaohongshu, 小紅書), DeepSeek was developed to compete with the West and to expand China’s global market using opportunistic measures and penetrative pricing, which are accompanied by risks of cybersecurity leaks and data manipulation. Amid the tech competition between the US and China, the rise of R1 is a wake-up call and poses a new challenge to the US and Western tech giants, which have long led the industry, but have failed to thoroughly implement high-tech governance and export restrictions.
US experts have called for more collective actions to seal loopholes in the US and improve Western allies’ high-tech curbs. More comprehensive policies must also be developed to bolster AI outputs from democracies to lessen adoptions of Chinese models.
Taiwan in particular needs to speed up developing sovereign AI to reduce China’s impact, and utilize its strength in semiconductors and cooperate with more like-minded countries and institutions in strategic AI developments, such as in advanced generative AI applications and data centers. Taiwan could play a more crucial role in the democratic allies’ reindustrialization and in upholding their leading position over China in the AI race.
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS