Max Weber is one of the most influential public intellectuals of the 20th century. His lecture “Politics as a Vocation,” delivered in 1919 and published in Max Weber’s Complete Writings on Academic and Political Vocations, examines the ethical responsibilities or what some might call the moral choices made by political leaders and public figures.
Weber said that there are three pre-eminent qualities that are decisive for a politician: passion, a feeling of responsibility and a sense of proportion.
Devotion to politics arises from and is sustained by passion. That means passion in the sense of matter-of-factness, of passionate devotion to a “cause.” It is not passion in the sense of “sterile excitation.” A crucial quality of a politician is the ability to exercise self-restraint.
Political actions involve not only convictions and values, but also consequences that could follow, including influences on others and the responsibilities they should bear.
Weber defined and elaborated the antithesis between the ethics of responsibility and the ethics of conviction. He said the latter is in the sense of self-righteousness that is fundamentally different from and irreconcilably opposed to the former. In other words, that is a realist approach to morality, striking a balance between values and reality.
Weber said those who see politics as a vocation should not only consider moral principles, but should also evaluate restraints and long-term consequences in reality when they negotiate.
To satisfy those two conditions, the most decisive psychological quality of a politician is their sense of proportion — the ability to let realities work upon themselves with inner concentration and calmness. That is their distance to things and others which is to forge warm passion and a cool sense of proportion together. Weber said that politics is made with the head, not with other parts of the body or spirit.
Weber’s teachings apply to the current recall movement.
The current struggles initiated by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party is damaging the whole country and the rights of Taiwanese. The situation would deteriorate if nothing is done to stop them.
Although the Democratic Progressive Party, the “Bluebird movement,” intellectuals and those affected by the opposition parties’ controversial amendments are furious, most people remain indifferent.
Recalling elected officials is a civil right, which is an issue that the government and the ruling party do not have any say in. However, those who are the most powerful bear the consequences. The battlefield is brutal.
The opposition parties would definitely fight back and wage a full-fledged war. The blame would be shifted to the pan-green camp. The war would last for another six months. What would the moderate voters who swing between the green camp and the blue camp think?
If successful, the recall movement would have a deterrent effect or, on the other hand, it could backfire. The political turmoil could intensify in the coming three years, which would make reconciliation difficult.
Therefore, people should remain calm to make observations and judgements, but that does not mean they should turn a blind eye to the situation or to pour cold water on the issue.
Their mission is to let people understand how this could damage the country and harm people’s rights. Taiwanese should also get to grips with public opinion.
The best option would be to precisely recall the most unpopular legislators, because the goal is to promote the movement and to yield an unexpectedly good result.
Lee Wen-chung is a former legislator.
Translated by Fion Khan
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic
RSS