US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with China.
Trump’s tariff orders were based on the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, which authorizes a US president to manage imports during a national emergency. His cited emergency is the flow of undocumented immigrants and fentanyl into the US. The orders indicate the beginning of potential trade disputes during his second term. Tariffs on the EU are also expected, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Friday.
In addition, the US would impose tariffs on computer chips, pharmaceuticals, steel, aluminum, copper and natural gas imports as soon as the middle of this month, he added, without citing specific countries. Clearly, macroeconomic factors would start to weigh on market sentiment and global trade as uncertainties increase even as Trump's tariffs on Canada and Mexico have been delayed for a month as leaders from both countries took steps to assuage the US president’s concerns.
During his first term, Trump had advisers who could help keep him in check, but his new administration is filled with loyalists. Take US secretary of commerce-designate Howard Lutnick, who would oversee tariff and trade policies. At a confirmation hearing on Wednesday last week before the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Lutnick said he supported implementing across-the-board tariffs country by country to force trade partners to comply with Trump’s demand and the US’ interests.
Tariffs are one of the few policies Trump has consistently pushed through from his first term to the second term. On the campaign trail last year, he pledged to use tariffs to wield US leverage abroad. Most economists expect his tariff and immigration policies to be at least mildly inflationary, saying that they could stifle US economic growth. They would also trigger tit-for-tat retaliations and reduce global trade, but Trump said he was not concerned about the reaction of financial markets.
Trump has also ordered a review of policies regarding semiconductors, which might include measures against overseas chip production such as in Taiwan and subsidy agreements under the CHIPS and Science Act. Trump earlier suggested that high tariffs on overseas chipmakers could compel companies to build plants in the US.
“They left us, and they went to Taiwan... And we want them to come back, and we don’t want to give them billions of dollars,” he said on Monday last week.
Trump’s top focus in semiconductor policy is pressuring foreign chipmakers into making greater concessions and accelerating investment commitments in the US. Even though Taiwan’s semiconductor manufacturing technology is crucial to helping realize his “America First” policy, any adjustments in US semiconductor policy are likely to affect Taiwan’s industry, information technology exports to the US and subsidies for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co to invest in the US.
As strong US allies such as Canada are subject to Trump’s first wave of tariffs, Taiwan should not think that it would be excluded. Trump would not only target semiconductors, but also other Taiwanese products. Therefore, the government must have communication channels in place to engage with the White House as soon as possible and reaffirm Taiwan’s commitment as a friend of the US. Taiwanese firms must also continue diversifying their markets and pursuing further supply chain reallocation, even shifting production to the US, in preparation for potential trade disputes and financial turmoil, while seizing opportunities as they arise.
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS