When scientists constructed a puzzle-solving task and pitted teams of people against teams of ants, the insects sometimes proved to be the smarter species. That is not to denigrate human intelligence — ants are smart, and their feats of coordinated activity are rare in nature.
Still, it is fair to say the results were humbling and that ants have something important to teach us. There is a lesson in why we sometimes fail to accomplish anything in staff meetings and why committees sometimes settle on a less effective solution to a problem than individual people could have provided.
The experiment used two versions of the same maze — one ant-sized and the other scaled to the size of a tennis court. Both species had to transport a T-shaped object — something bulky compared with their bodies — through a tricky series of openings. It was a bit like moving an awkwardly large couch through a narrow hallway or stairwell. The object had to be in just the right orientation to pass through the first opening and then rotate to pass through the second.
Illustration: Yusha
In videos that recently went viral, the ants — called longhorn crazy ants (Paratrechina longicornis) — danced through the exercise with such grace that even ant experts were amazed. The groups of humans appeared to bumble clumsily through the task. Some teams of ants solved the puzzle faster than some teams of humans.
Individual humans still always beat individual ants, said Ofer Feinerman, one of the authors of the research, which was published last month in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, but their performance vastly improved when they teamed up. Humans’ performance did not.
Yet humans have accomplished incredible feats of cooperation — we landed on the moon and built supercomputers and space telescopes as groups. Sometimes, we soar beyond what an individual could achieve, and sometimes, we get mired in groupthink. Good leadership can help, but it is not the whole answer.
Ants do not choose a leader, said Feinerman, a professor at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel.
Imagine you are helping move furniture, and you are in a position where you cannot see what is ahead. You would hold up your part and move with the group. That is what most of the ants do, he said.
However, a few would periodically detach from the group and get a better view of the walls of the puzzle. Then, since they have more knowledge, they nudge things in what they think is the right direction, he added.
The result is what Feinerman calls self-organization. The individual ants have no idea how the puzzle works, and intelligence emerges on the group level.
When allowed to communicate, human groups performed about as well as the average individual in the group, so there was no advantage to teaming up. He also tried making the humans perform under the same constraints the ants faced: They were instructed not to talk or even gesture to communicate. They did far worse.
The humans just wanted to reach a consensus — so much so that they gave up on pushing their individual ideas, and the consensus was almost always the most obvious solution, not the right one. That happens even if 80 percent of the people know the correct answer, he said. “They will not go with the majority and choose the correct thing. No, they will choose the bad and simple thing.”
Anna Dornhaus, a biologist who studies ant behavior at the University of Arizona, got an inside view of the experiment. Feinerman asked her to be one of his human subjects, and she agreed.
She said that when she and her teammates were not allowed to communicate, they had to decide whether to pull according to their hunches or follow others. She never knew if she was following along with the crowd or one particularly forceful individual. She knew the object would go nowhere if everyone tried to lead.
“A lot of it is about not being in paralysis because people disagree on what should be tried first,” she said. They eventually got through, but it took a couple of wrong tries.
In the real world, people have different ways of coordinating behavior. In a fast-moving restaurant kitchen, there is often exquisite orchestration, but it is fragile, dependent on a division of labor and subject to collapse if one person cannot perform, she said. (That is what makes the kitchen drama The Bear so suspenseful).
She said that ants function a little like the neurons in our brains.
They also self-organize rather than following leaders, and if neurons in one area get damaged, others pick up the slack. Individual worker ants, like most cells in our bodies, cannot reproduce on their own, so there is no evolutionary advantage to competing. People, on the other hand, always have conflicts of interest — natural selection programmed us to be selfish or altruistic, depending on the circumstances.
Crowds can be both wise and foolish, although the phenomenon known as the wisdom of the crowd only happens when large groups of people can think independently. Once they start to influence each other, they tend to ignore their wisdom in favor of consensus.
Feinerman said he does not necessarily think the groups of struggling humans were stupid. Nor were the individual ants. All animals are limited in different ways.
We humans are gifted with the ability to study other species and learn from them — so we can fly like birds and dive like whales.
Now, we might aspire to coordinate our business meetings and other group endeavors a little more like ants.
F.D. Flam is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering science. She is host of the Follow the Science podcast. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic
RSS