Next week, the nation is to celebrate the Lunar New Year break. Unfortunately, cold winds are a-blowing, literally and figuratively. The Central Weather Administration has warned of an approaching cold air mass, while obstinate winds of chaos eddy around the Legislative Yuan.
English theologian Thomas Fuller optimistically pointed out in 1650 that “it’s always darkest before the dawn.” We could paraphrase by saying the coldest days are just before the renewed hope of spring. However, one must temper any optimism about the damage being done in the legislature by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), under KMT legislative caucus leader Fu Kun-chi’s (傅崐萁) disruptive manipulation: All indications are that the chaos and disruption have only just begun.
Most recently, the opposition parties forced through amendments to hobble the Constitutional Court, impoverished the central government, slashed the defense budget and hindered voters’ right of recall.
Today we publish an open letter to Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) by representatives of the Taiwanese-American community, who welcome his attendance in the US for President Donald Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20. The letter speaks of pride in Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development, but also of frustration that the KMT and TPP legislators are clearly not prioritizing the interests of the country. It condemns their abuse of the power they were given by the electorate.
One is reminded of Han’s KMT-affiliated predecessor, former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), who served in that position between 1999 and 2016, under KMT and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations. Wang responded to one of the most serious political disruptions of Taiwan’s democratic era, the constitutional crisis brought about by the storming and occupation of the Legislative Yuan in 2014 over his own party’s attempts to force through the cross-strait trade in services agreement. In his handling of that crisis, he showed political wisdom, integrity and neutrality.
The open letter finds little evidence of Wang’s precedent in Han’s approach, and reproaches him for that, demanding that he put an end to the “ridiculous farce playing out in the legislature.”
Han made a show of cross-party unity in the make-up of the delegation to the US, with members of the DPP, KMT and TPP present, who all expressed hope that the unity among themselves could be maintained when they returned to Taiwan. That is at best an aspiration, at most a cynical soundbite.
Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said on Thursday that the Cabinet is considering asking the legislature to hold a revote on the budget plan, citing the right and obligation of the Executive Yuan under Article 3 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution.
The same day, President William Lai (賴清德) said that although he promulgated the amendments to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法), he would call for a court ruling on their constitutionality.
The KMT said that Lai’s promulgation of the law while applying for a constitutional interpretation is the worst example of going against the public opinion. It is not. It is Lai’s constitutional right.
From 1991 to 2005, seven amendments were made to the Constitution. Little action was taken to bring it more in touch with the needs of today’s Taiwan during the administrations of former presidents Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). The Constitution is straining under the crisis created by the opposition parties’ egregious actions.
US legal scholar Bruce Ackerman coined the term “constitutional moment” to describe a period of heightened public engagement and deliberation about a nation’s constitution. Taiwan needs to face up to the idea that it is at its own constitutional moment.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS