Next week, the nation is to celebrate the Lunar New Year break. Unfortunately, cold winds are a-blowing, literally and figuratively. The Central Weather Administration has warned of an approaching cold air mass, while obstinate winds of chaos eddy around the Legislative Yuan.
English theologian Thomas Fuller optimistically pointed out in 1650 that “it’s always darkest before the dawn.” We could paraphrase by saying the coldest days are just before the renewed hope of spring. However, one must temper any optimism about the damage being done in the legislature by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), under KMT legislative caucus leader Fu Kun-chi’s (傅崐萁) disruptive manipulation: All indications are that the chaos and disruption have only just begun.
Most recently, the opposition parties forced through amendments to hobble the Constitutional Court, impoverished the central government, slashed the defense budget and hindered voters’ right of recall.
Today we publish an open letter to Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) by representatives of the Taiwanese-American community, who welcome his attendance in the US for President Donald Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20. The letter speaks of pride in Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development, but also of frustration that the KMT and TPP legislators are clearly not prioritizing the interests of the country. It condemns their abuse of the power they were given by the electorate.
One is reminded of Han’s KMT-affiliated predecessor, former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), who served in that position between 1999 and 2016, under KMT and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations. Wang responded to one of the most serious political disruptions of Taiwan’s democratic era, the constitutional crisis brought about by the storming and occupation of the Legislative Yuan in 2014 over his own party’s attempts to force through the cross-strait trade in services agreement. In his handling of that crisis, he showed political wisdom, integrity and neutrality.
The open letter finds little evidence of Wang’s precedent in Han’s approach, and reproaches him for that, demanding that he put an end to the “ridiculous farce playing out in the legislature.”
Han made a show of cross-party unity in the make-up of the delegation to the US, with members of the DPP, KMT and TPP present, who all expressed hope that the unity among themselves could be maintained when they returned to Taiwan. That is at best an aspiration, at most a cynical soundbite.
Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said on Thursday that the Cabinet is considering asking the legislature to hold a revote on the budget plan, citing the right and obligation of the Executive Yuan under Article 3 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution.
The same day, President William Lai (賴清德) said that although he promulgated the amendments to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法), he would call for a court ruling on their constitutionality.
The KMT said that Lai’s promulgation of the law while applying for a constitutional interpretation is the worst example of going against the public opinion. It is not. It is Lai’s constitutional right.
From 1991 to 2005, seven amendments were made to the Constitution. Little action was taken to bring it more in touch with the needs of today’s Taiwan during the administrations of former presidents Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). The Constitution is straining under the crisis created by the opposition parties’ egregious actions.
US legal scholar Bruce Ackerman coined the term “constitutional moment” to describe a period of heightened public engagement and deliberation about a nation’s constitution. Taiwan needs to face up to the idea that it is at its own constitutional moment.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS