Now that US President Donald Trump has taken office, markets and the economy have a new and very different driving force. Forget about the US Federal Reserve. The US’ outlook would depend much more on how, and to what extent, the president puts his plans on everything from tariffs to deportations into action.
What to expect? That is a very difficult question. Nevertheless, one can make an educated guess. Here is mine.
Trump would take tariffs much higher than before — to at least 10 percent of aggregate imports, compared with 3 percent in his first term. He is genuinely a fan, seeing them as a great negotiating tool and income generator. His government needs the revenue, given projected budget deficits of about 6 percent of GDP over the next decade (and that is assuming no extension of the 2017 tax cuts). As a result, inflation would probably run 25 to 50 basis points higher over the next year, as importers pass on costs and protected domestic producers raise prices. This price shock would come at a time when inflation is already above the Fed’s 2 percent target. It would depress consumer spending, especially for lower-income households that have no savings buffer and spend more of their income on imported goods.
Trump would follow through on deportations, but I expect less rather than more. Ejecting millions of people from the US is logistically difficult. A committed effort would take years, not months, and the resulting labor shortages would be too economically damaging. Still, even a smaller number — say, focused on convicted criminals — would exacerbate a shortage of workers that is limiting growth. Together with former US president Joe Biden’s crackdown on border crossings, the retirement of baby boomers and the already elevated participation rate among prime-age workers, modest deportations could hold the annual increase in the labor supply to less than 0.5 percent. This implies a maximum real GDP growth rate of just 1.5 percent to 2.5 percent.
Trump and Congress would extend the 2017 tax cuts, but would not enact other costly campaign promises, such as reducing taxation of social security benefits and tips. Given the dire budget outlook, some Republicans would balk at added tax cuts without offsetting spending cuts, which would be hard to agree on. Consensus is lacking: House and Senate Republicans have differing appetites for fiscal probity, while Democrats are likely united against bigger tax cuts (with the exception of increasing the state-and-local-tax deduction).
For this year, all this suggests a difficult economic trajectory. Expect higher inflation, elevated interest rates, slower growth and more volatility as markets and the Fed struggle to adjust to Trump’s pronouncements and actions. In short, prepare for turbulence ahead.
Bill Dudley, a Bloomberg Opinion columnist, served as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York from 2009 to 2018. He is the chair of the Bretton Woods Committee, and has been a nonexecutive director at Swiss bank UBS since 2019. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS