Now that US President Donald Trump has taken office, markets and the economy have a new and very different driving force. Forget about the US Federal Reserve. The US’ outlook would depend much more on how, and to what extent, the president puts his plans on everything from tariffs to deportations into action.
What to expect? That is a very difficult question. Nevertheless, one can make an educated guess. Here is mine.
Trump would take tariffs much higher than before — to at least 10 percent of aggregate imports, compared with 3 percent in his first term. He is genuinely a fan, seeing them as a great negotiating tool and income generator. His government needs the revenue, given projected budget deficits of about 6 percent of GDP over the next decade (and that is assuming no extension of the 2017 tax cuts). As a result, inflation would probably run 25 to 50 basis points higher over the next year, as importers pass on costs and protected domestic producers raise prices. This price shock would come at a time when inflation is already above the Fed’s 2 percent target. It would depress consumer spending, especially for lower-income households that have no savings buffer and spend more of their income on imported goods.
Trump would follow through on deportations, but I expect less rather than more. Ejecting millions of people from the US is logistically difficult. A committed effort would take years, not months, and the resulting labor shortages would be too economically damaging. Still, even a smaller number — say, focused on convicted criminals — would exacerbate a shortage of workers that is limiting growth. Together with former US president Joe Biden’s crackdown on border crossings, the retirement of baby boomers and the already elevated participation rate among prime-age workers, modest deportations could hold the annual increase in the labor supply to less than 0.5 percent. This implies a maximum real GDP growth rate of just 1.5 percent to 2.5 percent.
Trump and Congress would extend the 2017 tax cuts, but would not enact other costly campaign promises, such as reducing taxation of social security benefits and tips. Given the dire budget outlook, some Republicans would balk at added tax cuts without offsetting spending cuts, which would be hard to agree on. Consensus is lacking: House and Senate Republicans have differing appetites for fiscal probity, while Democrats are likely united against bigger tax cuts (with the exception of increasing the state-and-local-tax deduction).
For this year, all this suggests a difficult economic trajectory. Expect higher inflation, elevated interest rates, slower growth and more volatility as markets and the Fed struggle to adjust to Trump’s pronouncements and actions. In short, prepare for turbulence ahead.
Bill Dudley, a Bloomberg Opinion columnist, served as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York from 2009 to 2018. He is the chair of the Bretton Woods Committee, and has been a nonexecutive director at Swiss bank UBS since 2019. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS