Now that US President Donald Trump has taken office, markets and the economy have a new and very different driving force. Forget about the US Federal Reserve. The US’ outlook would depend much more on how, and to what extent, the president puts his plans on everything from tariffs to deportations into action.
What to expect? That is a very difficult question. Nevertheless, one can make an educated guess. Here is mine.
Trump would take tariffs much higher than before — to at least 10 percent of aggregate imports, compared with 3 percent in his first term. He is genuinely a fan, seeing them as a great negotiating tool and income generator. His government needs the revenue, given projected budget deficits of about 6 percent of GDP over the next decade (and that is assuming no extension of the 2017 tax cuts). As a result, inflation would probably run 25 to 50 basis points higher over the next year, as importers pass on costs and protected domestic producers raise prices. This price shock would come at a time when inflation is already above the Fed’s 2 percent target. It would depress consumer spending, especially for lower-income households that have no savings buffer and spend more of their income on imported goods.
Trump would follow through on deportations, but I expect less rather than more. Ejecting millions of people from the US is logistically difficult. A committed effort would take years, not months, and the resulting labor shortages would be too economically damaging. Still, even a smaller number — say, focused on convicted criminals — would exacerbate a shortage of workers that is limiting growth. Together with former US president Joe Biden’s crackdown on border crossings, the retirement of baby boomers and the already elevated participation rate among prime-age workers, modest deportations could hold the annual increase in the labor supply to less than 0.5 percent. This implies a maximum real GDP growth rate of just 1.5 percent to 2.5 percent.
Trump and Congress would extend the 2017 tax cuts, but would not enact other costly campaign promises, such as reducing taxation of social security benefits and tips. Given the dire budget outlook, some Republicans would balk at added tax cuts without offsetting spending cuts, which would be hard to agree on. Consensus is lacking: House and Senate Republicans have differing appetites for fiscal probity, while Democrats are likely united against bigger tax cuts (with the exception of increasing the state-and-local-tax deduction).
For this year, all this suggests a difficult economic trajectory. Expect higher inflation, elevated interest rates, slower growth and more volatility as markets and the Fed struggle to adjust to Trump’s pronouncements and actions. In short, prepare for turbulence ahead.
Bill Dudley, a Bloomberg Opinion columnist, served as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York from 2009 to 2018. He is the chair of the Bretton Woods Committee, and has been a nonexecutive director at Swiss bank UBS since 2019. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS