Young Taiwanese are consuming an increasing amount of Chinese content on TikTok, causing them to have more favorable views of China, a Financial Times report cited Taiwanese social scientists and politicians as saying.
Taiwanese are being exposed to disinformation of a political nature from China, even when using TikTok to view entertainment-related content, the article published on Friday last week said.
Fewer young people identify as “Taiwanese” (as opposed to “Chinese”) compared with past years, it wrote, citing the results of a survey last year by the Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation.
Nevertheless, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would be hard-pressed to enforce a ban on TikTok similar to the one implemented in the US, it cited DPP Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) as saying.
“The very moment a DPP government [moved] on this, we’d have the opposition at our throat accusing us of restricting free speech,” Shen said.
Shen is correct that a ban would be hard to impose. Even failing interference by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Taiwan People’s Party, a ban would alienate young Taiwanese voters. The Financial Times wrote that young TikTok users it spoke with dismissed as “nonsense” the idea they were being influenced. However, a study showed that TikTok users were significantly more likely to oppose Taiwan’s independence than those who do not use it.
International media reported that a large number of TikTok users in the US began using Red Note after the TikTok ban was announced. Some users who spoke to the media said that it was an act of rebellion against censorship, and against a government that they felt did not represent their interests.
This phenomenon is likely to be even more pronounced in Taiwan, as much of the content consumed by Taiwanese on TikTok is aimed at sowing distrust toward the DPP, and convincing Taiwanese that they are Chinese and that the unification of Taiwan and China is inevitable.
Moreover, TikTok as a facilitator of disinformation and cognitive warfare presents a much bigger threat to Taiwan than China’s previous efforts on that front. Previously, Beijing would employ Taiwanese content creators to help it spread disinformation in Taiwan through platforms like Facebook, Line and YouTube. However, the impact was limited, as it required Taiwanese to seek out specific content on platforms saturated with competing content.
With TikTok, Beijing has a platform of its own and can manipulate the algorithm to feed users whatever content it wants. TikTok is also shown to be more addictive than other platforms due to its short-video format and its manipulation of behavioral psychology to give users a sense of instant gratification.
Taiwanese authorities must be creative to tackle this threat, as an outright ban is unlikely to solve the problem. Aside from the backlash that a ban would cause, users could simply use virtual private networks to spoof their location using a proxy servee.
One option would be to shadow ban Taiwanese on TikTok by intercepting communications at the Internet service provider (ISP) level. Users would think their comments were being ignored, the algorithm would not reach them and the user would get bored and stop using it. Another option would be to filter TikTok traffic at the ISP level, having its content fact-checked by artificial intelligence. Content deemed to be disinformation could be blocked, or users could be sent warnings through watermarks superimposed on the content or by push notifications.
Finally, Taiwan could fight fire with fire, flooding TikTok with pro-Taiwan independence content, or content that portrays human rights abuses in China.
Banning TikTok is not likely an option for Taiwan, but neither is allowing the service to operate unimpeded. The government must explore options to tackle this threat.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS