Greenland is one of the few places on Earth where climate change is sometimes referred to as an opportunity by making it less inhabitable for those who live there and more accessible to those who do not, a point not missed by leaders elsewhere. With the landmass no longer safely insulated by sea ice, the world is knocking on Greenland’s door.
However, it is not all upside: Even while the effects of a warming planet open up new revenue streams for Greenland’s 57,000-strong population via mining, shipping and tourism, they would also have to reckon with potential losses of heritage and new weather risks.
The Arctic is often referred to as a canary in the coal mine when it comes to the climate. The polar region is at the frontline of the crisis, warming nearly four times faster than the global average rate between 1979 and 2021. Every year, scientists head to Greenland’s vast ice sheet with measuring devices, but Inuit, the indigenous people who make up the majority of the island’s population, do not need specialist equipment to study the transformation — they have seen the changes with their own eyes.
Pelle Tejsner, an anthropologist at Ilisimatusarfik, the University of Greenland, told me that Inuit have observed the wind growing stronger, hindering the formation of sea ice. For hundreds of years, Inuit traversed the terrain on dogsleds to fish and hunt. In a single generation, that tradition has become endangered by thin ice and less predictable weather.
In a territory with almost no roads, the changing conditions risk isolating remote communities, while the decline in subsistence hunting has implications for food security as 32 percent of residents collect half or more of their food from the wild, according to a 2018-2019 survey. But it is the loss of tradition that might be hardest to deal with. After all, heritage — both intangible and material — is linked to human well-being and social cohesion. Both are being lost in a warming Arctic.
The consequences are already becoming visible, with a decline in the number of sled dogs and people moving to modern jobs from subsistence lifestyles. The latter might not be such a bad thing — but after already suffering greatly from colonialism at the hands of Denmark, it is yet another blow to indigenous identity and culture in the region.
Half the respondents to a survey of Greenland residents said that climate change would harm people in the autonomous territory. Many also said it would benefit farming, tourism, shipping and mining. Others, when asked to think of ways warming would affect them and their families, cited some benefits including “bigger potatoes,” “more fish” and “greater business opportunities.”
There might well be positives for Greenland: Warming temperatures and receding glaciers make precious minerals easier to access, extend the growing season on the south of the island, bring new species of fish to the self-ruling territory’s waters, promise to open up new trade routes and extend the tourism season. The island’s mineral wealth and strategic location are why US President Donald Trump has said, once again, that he wants to buy the territory. Trump’s comments were followed up with a visit by his son and an influx of red MAGA hats into the capital, Nuuk. The Danish and Greenlandic prime ministers have stressed that Greenland is not for sale.
Increasingly, unstable weather conditions mean that even these benefits cannot be relied upon. Summers whiplash between being extremely rainy or very dry, which is straining agriculture in the region. Depending on the weather, farmers have been left without hay for winter feed or with sodden crops. Contrary to expectations, the number of farms has actually shrunk in recent years.
Greenland’s fishing industry, which provides more than 80 percent of the territory’s export income, has enjoyed bumper hauls and new species moving north as oceans warm, but as well as stormier seas, receding glaciers are blasting out mud. This nutrient-rich silt, known as glacial rock flour, is not all bad — it can be used as fertilizer on crops and absorbs carbon dioxide from the air — but its presence reduces visibility for fishermen and forces fish into deeper waters, where they are also out of reach of the nets. It also posed problems in 2023 for a luxury cruise ship that was stuck in the mud off the eastern coast of the island for three days.
Tourism is seen as a promising source of income for Greenlanders, but that is also accompanied by a paradox. Climate change allows more people to visit, but tourists arriving via cruise ships or on international flights into a newly expanded airport generate carbon emissions that exacerbate the problem. As Birger Poppel, project chief emeritus of the Survey of Living Conditions in the Arctic at Ilisimatusarfik, pointed out to me, the impacts of climate change on the traditional Inuit lifestyle might also devalue tourism in the area. One of the highlighted experiences on Greenland’s official tourism Web site, for example, is dogsledding. Aforementioned, climate change is making the sea ice thinner and more unstable in a larger part of the winter season, limiting tourist and hunting activities based on sled-pulling pooches.
Climate is not the only thing that is changing on the island. With an election coming up this year, Greenlanders are facing debates over the territory’s independence and future ties to global powers. The right question might not be “is climate change an opportunity?” but rather: “Who are we in a changing climate?”
Lara Williams is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS