Taiwanese CEOs, especially those in the technology sector, have been anxious about US President Donald Trump’s new trade policies since he won a second term, as the tariff-free regime established under the Information Technology Agreement (ITA) would be severely challenged amid an escalating US-China technology race.
A wide range of electronics, such as computers and mobile phones, are exempted from tariffs under the original ITA, which was signed by WTO members. However, Trump is highly likely to carry out his campaign promises by slapping aggressive tariffs on semiconductor and information and communications technology (ICT) products.
Taiwan is a major ICT producer, from Apples Inc’s iPhones and MacBook computers to the latest artificial intelligence (AI) servers for Nvidia Corp and the world’s hyperscalers, including Alphabet, Amazon.com, Meta and Microsoft. These manufacturers are facing imminent US tariffs starting at 10 percent.
Earlier this month, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said that although Taiwan would be at least mildly affected by the looming 10 percent tariffs, its technological advantages would allow it to mostly absorb their impact. Taiwan would therefore be in a relatively better position than countries such as Mexico, Canada and China, which could face tariffs of 60 percent or even higher, he said.
However, only a small portion of ICT products are exported directly from Taiwan. A much bigger portion is shipped to the US from manufacturing sites in China, Mexico and Southeast Asian countries, including Thailand and Vietnam, where local manufacturers relocated their Chinese production after Trump won his first term. Since then, local companies have been asked by customers to set up new manufacturing facilities outside of China and Taiwan under the “China+1” or “Taiwan+1” policy to strengthen supply chain resilience amid worsening US-China relations and cross-strait tensions.
As of the end of November, about 93 percent of Taiwan’s ICT exports were produced abroad, while about 35 percent of chips and other electronics were made at foreign sites, according to statistics compiled by the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
The issue is more complicated than building more resilient supply chains, as Trump’s threat to raise tariffs would also significantly increase manufacturing costs. The challenges for the CEOs are how to find multiple places to build production sites that would minimize US tariffs. It is no longer as easy to profit from large-scale production lines. More likely, they would start building smaller factories in more locations to adapt to the ever-changing external environment, some industry experts said.
A recent survey released by KPMG found similar results. Executives of Taiwanese companies with an annual revenue of US$500 million or more last year ranked geopolitical factors as the third-biggest risk facing their business, up from No. 7 in 2023. Meanwhile, supply chain management was their No. 4 concern, up from No. 5. The CEOs would have to grapple with issues that come with an increasing number of supply chains, including localization and green energy concerns, as well as preventing disruptions from rising manufacturing costs, according to the survey.
Lately, more companies are starting to build production lines in the US to avoid supply chain disruptions and higher manufacturing costs due to heavier tariffs. In the past, high labor costs, a culture gap and complicated rules have scared away Taiwanese businesses. However, the ministry has encouraged domestic chip-related companies to shift production to the US and offered assistance to do so.
As supply chains become fragmented and more expensive the bigger challenge for Taiwanese CEOs would be operating those new production sites as cost-effectively as at home and in other countries, while providing equally high-quality products.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS