Taiwanese CEOs, especially those in the technology sector, have been anxious about US President Donald Trump’s new trade policies since he won a second term, as the tariff-free regime established under the Information Technology Agreement (ITA) would be severely challenged amid an escalating US-China technology race.
A wide range of electronics, such as computers and mobile phones, are exempted from tariffs under the original ITA, which was signed by WTO members. However, Trump is highly likely to carry out his campaign promises by slapping aggressive tariffs on semiconductor and information and communications technology (ICT) products.
Taiwan is a major ICT producer, from Apples Inc’s iPhones and MacBook computers to the latest artificial intelligence (AI) servers for Nvidia Corp and the world’s hyperscalers, including Alphabet, Amazon.com, Meta and Microsoft. These manufacturers are facing imminent US tariffs starting at 10 percent.
Earlier this month, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said that although Taiwan would be at least mildly affected by the looming 10 percent tariffs, its technological advantages would allow it to mostly absorb their impact. Taiwan would therefore be in a relatively better position than countries such as Mexico, Canada and China, which could face tariffs of 60 percent or even higher, he said.
However, only a small portion of ICT products are exported directly from Taiwan. A much bigger portion is shipped to the US from manufacturing sites in China, Mexico and Southeast Asian countries, including Thailand and Vietnam, where local manufacturers relocated their Chinese production after Trump won his first term. Since then, local companies have been asked by customers to set up new manufacturing facilities outside of China and Taiwan under the “China+1” or “Taiwan+1” policy to strengthen supply chain resilience amid worsening US-China relations and cross-strait tensions.
As of the end of November, about 93 percent of Taiwan’s ICT exports were produced abroad, while about 35 percent of chips and other electronics were made at foreign sites, according to statistics compiled by the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
The issue is more complicated than building more resilient supply chains, as Trump’s threat to raise tariffs would also significantly increase manufacturing costs. The challenges for the CEOs are how to find multiple places to build production sites that would minimize US tariffs. It is no longer as easy to profit from large-scale production lines. More likely, they would start building smaller factories in more locations to adapt to the ever-changing external environment, some industry experts said.
A recent survey released by KPMG found similar results. Executives of Taiwanese companies with an annual revenue of US$500 million or more last year ranked geopolitical factors as the third-biggest risk facing their business, up from No. 7 in 2023. Meanwhile, supply chain management was their No. 4 concern, up from No. 5. The CEOs would have to grapple with issues that come with an increasing number of supply chains, including localization and green energy concerns, as well as preventing disruptions from rising manufacturing costs, according to the survey.
Lately, more companies are starting to build production lines in the US to avoid supply chain disruptions and higher manufacturing costs due to heavier tariffs. In the past, high labor costs, a culture gap and complicated rules have scared away Taiwanese businesses. However, the ministry has encouraged domestic chip-related companies to shift production to the US and offered assistance to do so.
As supply chains become fragmented and more expensive the bigger challenge for Taiwanese CEOs would be operating those new production sites as cost-effectively as at home and in other countries, while providing equally high-quality products.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS