In his inaugural address, US President Donald Trump promised a new golden age, casting himself as a uniter, but for a speech that heralded a bright future, it often echoed the past.
Much of Trump’s rhetoric mirrored his words eight years ago, when he was first sworn in as president and spoke about a country with a failing economy and cities torn apart by crime. On Monday, he portrayed himself as a victim of a weaponized justice system under former US president Joe Biden.
Trump said he had a mandate to carry out his vision for the country after winning the popular vote in an improbable political comeback that culminated in his taking the oath of office in the very building his supporters stormed four years ago in a failed attempt to overturn his 2020 election loss.
“From this moment on, America’s decline is over,” Trump said, speaking in the US Capitol Rotunda. “Our golden age has just begun.”
He promised to be “a peacemaker and a uniter,” but then swiftly announced sweeping policy changes on issues that have divided the country. He vowed to end federal diversity initiatives and said he would sign an order declaring that there are only two genders.
He called for a “revolution of common sense” on gender and racial diversity issues as he defines it, one that includes some and excludes others.
He thanked the black and Hispanic voters who supported his campaign and in honor of Martin Luther King Jr Day said he wanted to make the slain civil rights leader’s dream a reality.
Trump’s idea of that dream appears to be what he referred to as a “colorblind” US that is a pure meritocracy.
Despite a close popular vote in last year’s election of just more than 1 percentage point, Trump suggested his victory gave him license to pursue his hard-right policies, while adding that he believes the attempt on his life last year was a matter of divine intervention that further fueled his resolve.
“I was saved by God to make America great again,” Trump said.
After contentious elections, new presidents often moderate their campaign-style rhetoric and drop attacks on their political adversaries. Not Trump.
With Biden seated nearby, Trump tore into the outgoing president’s policies on everything from immigration to foreign affairs. He said that his win had given him a “mandate to completely and totally reverse a horrible betrayal.”
“It was a campaign speech,” said Lindsay Chervinsky, a historian and executive director of the George Washington Presidential Library. “He blames the same people for the same things. It’s the same grievances.”
Rather than detail a list of lofty objectives for his administration, much of the near-term agenda Trump outlined involved simply reversing Biden-era policies.
At times, Trump did speak in aspirational terms, referring to the country’s “manifest destiny” and suggesting that he sought to expand its territory.
Trump also called for unity when he first took office in 2017. However, his subsequent presidency was marked by divisiveness, in rhetoric and policy.
To move forward, he might need to demonstrate in the coming weeks and months that he can let go of the grievances that have fueled him for so long — his two impeachments and his 2020 loss to Biden.
“Over the past eight years, I have been tested and challenged more than any president in our 250-year history,” Trump said. “And I’ve learned a lot along the way.”
Trump did not say what he had learned, but in his inaugural speech and two more he gave to supporters over the course of the day, he sounded like the same aggrieved Trump that Americans have come to know well over the years.
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS