In his inaugural address, US President Donald Trump promised a new golden age, casting himself as a uniter, but for a speech that heralded a bright future, it often echoed the past.
Much of Trump’s rhetoric mirrored his words eight years ago, when he was first sworn in as president and spoke about a country with a failing economy and cities torn apart by crime. On Monday, he portrayed himself as a victim of a weaponized justice system under former US president Joe Biden.
Trump said he had a mandate to carry out his vision for the country after winning the popular vote in an improbable political comeback that culminated in his taking the oath of office in the very building his supporters stormed four years ago in a failed attempt to overturn his 2020 election loss.
“From this moment on, America’s decline is over,” Trump said, speaking in the US Capitol Rotunda. “Our golden age has just begun.”
He promised to be “a peacemaker and a uniter,” but then swiftly announced sweeping policy changes on issues that have divided the country. He vowed to end federal diversity initiatives and said he would sign an order declaring that there are only two genders.
He called for a “revolution of common sense” on gender and racial diversity issues as he defines it, one that includes some and excludes others.
He thanked the black and Hispanic voters who supported his campaign and in honor of Martin Luther King Jr Day said he wanted to make the slain civil rights leader’s dream a reality.
Trump’s idea of that dream appears to be what he referred to as a “colorblind” US that is a pure meritocracy.
Despite a close popular vote in last year’s election of just more than 1 percentage point, Trump suggested his victory gave him license to pursue his hard-right policies, while adding that he believes the attempt on his life last year was a matter of divine intervention that further fueled his resolve.
“I was saved by God to make America great again,” Trump said.
After contentious elections, new presidents often moderate their campaign-style rhetoric and drop attacks on their political adversaries. Not Trump.
With Biden seated nearby, Trump tore into the outgoing president’s policies on everything from immigration to foreign affairs. He said that his win had given him a “mandate to completely and totally reverse a horrible betrayal.”
“It was a campaign speech,” said Lindsay Chervinsky, a historian and executive director of the George Washington Presidential Library. “He blames the same people for the same things. It’s the same grievances.”
Rather than detail a list of lofty objectives for his administration, much of the near-term agenda Trump outlined involved simply reversing Biden-era policies.
At times, Trump did speak in aspirational terms, referring to the country’s “manifest destiny” and suggesting that he sought to expand its territory.
Trump also called for unity when he first took office in 2017. However, his subsequent presidency was marked by divisiveness, in rhetoric and policy.
To move forward, he might need to demonstrate in the coming weeks and months that he can let go of the grievances that have fueled him for so long — his two impeachments and his 2020 loss to Biden.
“Over the past eight years, I have been tested and challenged more than any president in our 250-year history,” Trump said. “And I’ve learned a lot along the way.”
Trump did not say what he had learned, but in his inaugural speech and two more he gave to supporters over the course of the day, he sounded like the same aggrieved Trump that Americans have come to know well over the years.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS