Foolish visionaries
Following the Sunflower movement, people optimistically believed that the generation born and raised in a democratic Taiwan would naturally be independent — a generation that identifies as Taiwanese rather than Chinese, and that clearly recognizes that Taiwan is an independent, self-sovereign state. At the same time, this generation would be deeply concerned about China’s influence on Taiwanese society.
However, that optimism clearly overestimated the potential of “identity” to accumulate, while underestimating the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) aggressive intentions, and the power and tactics behind its infiltration.
Judging from the current social situation, it seems possible to rapidly create an environment that fosters the growth of a naturally independent generation, but it is equally possible that many members of a “democratic rich second generation” would be produced as a result.
Just as terms such as “rich second generation” (富二代) and “second government official generation” (官二代) carry negative connotations — because democracy and freedom have already become a part of Taiwanese’s daily life — many members of this young “democratic rich second generation” are indifferent to the origins of Taiwan’s democracy and freedom. They cannot imagine the consequences of losing it.
I have long been concerned with generational issues and, because I work in education, I am especially attentive to the cultural identity and values that young people prioritize. It is upsetting to see many of them casually make fun of the term “martial law” on social media, or use absurd and unfounded terms such as “green terror.”
Such comments, which reflect a lack of knowledge, logic and critical thinking, are quite worrying.
To interpret pro-CCP, anti-Taiwan rhetoric and the behavior of disseminating such ideas, I often use an idiom from Chinese Taoist philosopher Zhuangzi (莊子): “If they are not stupid, they are visionaries.”
The idiom means that if someone’s unjust actions do not stem from their own foolishness, they are intentionally and maliciously deceiving others.
I am willing to believe that the remarks of young people are not being made with malicious intent, but I also sincerely hope that this generation will learn to think independently and develop an earnest understanding of Taiwan’s history. They must not continue to be so easily fooled and brainwashed by pro-CCP forces.
Chiu Tzu-huan
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS