Foolish visionaries
Following the Sunflower movement, people optimistically believed that the generation born and raised in a democratic Taiwan would naturally be independent — a generation that identifies as Taiwanese rather than Chinese, and that clearly recognizes that Taiwan is an independent, self-sovereign state. At the same time, this generation would be deeply concerned about China’s influence on Taiwanese society.
However, that optimism clearly overestimated the potential of “identity” to accumulate, while underestimating the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) aggressive intentions, and the power and tactics behind its infiltration.
Judging from the current social situation, it seems possible to rapidly create an environment that fosters the growth of a naturally independent generation, but it is equally possible that many members of a “democratic rich second generation” would be produced as a result.
Just as terms such as “rich second generation” (富二代) and “second government official generation” (官二代) carry negative connotations — because democracy and freedom have already become a part of Taiwanese’s daily life — many members of this young “democratic rich second generation” are indifferent to the origins of Taiwan’s democracy and freedom. They cannot imagine the consequences of losing it.
I have long been concerned with generational issues and, because I work in education, I am especially attentive to the cultural identity and values that young people prioritize. It is upsetting to see many of them casually make fun of the term “martial law” on social media, or use absurd and unfounded terms such as “green terror.”
Such comments, which reflect a lack of knowledge, logic and critical thinking, are quite worrying.
To interpret pro-CCP, anti-Taiwan rhetoric and the behavior of disseminating such ideas, I often use an idiom from Chinese Taoist philosopher Zhuangzi (莊子): “If they are not stupid, they are visionaries.”
The idiom means that if someone’s unjust actions do not stem from their own foolishness, they are intentionally and maliciously deceiving others.
I am willing to believe that the remarks of young people are not being made with malicious intent, but I also sincerely hope that this generation will learn to think independently and develop an earnest understanding of Taiwan’s history. They must not continue to be so easily fooled and brainwashed by pro-CCP forces.
Chiu Tzu-huan
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS