Recent proposals by legislators from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) not only weaken the spirit of democracy and the rule of law, but also pose significant harm to Taiwan’s education, cultural development and the shaping of civic awareness.
The opposition parties have proposed budget cuts for the Ministry of Culture, the Taiwan Public Television Service Foundation and other government agencies, shortening the required wait for Chinese spouses to obtain national ID cards and relaxing the eligibility criteria for Chinese to join the National Health Insurance (NHI).
The effects of these proposals must be thoroughly examined from the perspective of civic education, and society must be encouraged to focus on fair and sustainable policies.
Budget cuts for cultural and education programs would jeopardize Taiwan’s long-term development. Education and culture — promoted through measures such as supporting rural education, preserving cultural heritage — are the foundation of a nation’s progress.
Through political manipulation, the coalition of KMT and TPP legislators aims to significantly cut important budgets for transitional justice education and historical preservation, which would deprive young people of opportunities to develop a comprehensive understanding of Taiwan’s history and culture.
Educators must persevere in emphasizing the crucial role of cultural education in shaping civic literacy and values.
Shortening the time required for Chinese spouses to obtain ID cards ignores the important issues of national security and fairness. Reducing the six-year requirement would spark anxiety over Chinese infiltration and possible fraudulent marriages, and would create inequalities for foreign spouses of other nationalities.
Relaxing eligibility requirements for Chinese nationals to join the NHI system poses a severe existential threat to Taiwan’s healthcare system. The KMT-TPP proposal to shorten the waiting period from six years to just one or two years is bound to attract swaths of Chinese nationals to use fraudulent marriages and other methods to quickly join the system, thereby stressing its finances and creating unfairness for other foreign nationals.
The NHI system should uphold the core values of equality and sustainability, and the overall interests of society must remain a primary consideration throughout the policymaking process.
The KMT’s and TPP’s controversial policies severely undermine Taiwan’s principles of democracy and fairness, while posing a significant threat to key national pillars such as education, culture and the NHI system. Such policies would undoubtedly have a multifaceted effect on Taiwanese society.
The opposition legislators, as they continue to undermine the Constitution and instill chaos in governance, are setting a bad example and creating serious obstacles to the development of civic awareness among young people. The heart of education lies in cultivating critical thinking skills and social responsibility among students.
Teachers must guide their students in discussions about the fairness of policies and their long-term effects. Stimulated discussions and analytical reports can help students understand the connection between the policymaking process and social responsibility. In this way, educators can foster moral values and critical thinking, while working with students to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy and social fairness, thereby building a more solid societal foundation for the next generation.
Pan Wei-yiu is a policymaker at the Taiwan Nation Alliance and president of the Union of Taiwanese Teachers.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion