Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) on Wednesday last week proposed cutting the Ministry of Culture’s entire NT$2.309 billion (US$70.47 million) budget allocated to the Taiwan Public Television Service Foundation in a move heavily criticized by the film and arts sector.
Chen also commented on a Facebook post by Offshore Island Publishing editor-in-chief Ho Hsin-chieh (何欣潔), writing that the media need to “throw out that begging bowl.”
However, before Chen starts casting aspersions at others, she should remember that her own constituency, Kinmen County, has its own cash cow, Kinmen Kaoliang Liquor. Every year, it receives a central government subsidy of up to NT$5 billion, while the local government-run newspaper, the Kinmen Daily News, lambasts the central government in its editorials.
Based on Chen’s logic, perhaps Kinmen should stand on its own two feet and stop going to the central government with its begging bowl held aloft.
Last year, Control Yuan member Ma Hsiu-ju (馬秀如) raised concerns that Kinmen Kaoliang Liquor had donated surplus profit to the Kinmen County Government before making its tax declaration, and reported the company for enriching local government coffers at the expense of the state. Ma asked the local government to address the issue. One Kinmen county councilor said that they could not rule out mobilizing local residents to “go by” Ma’s residence.
That kind of behavior reflects poorly on the nation as a whole.
Perhaps Chen should follow her own example and propose in the Legislative Yuan that Kinmen discard its own “begging bowl.” That would reassure everyone that the KMT is genuinely watching the purse strings, mitigate the negative impression of Kinmen that the county commissioner brought upon it by attempting to intimidate a member of the Control Yuan and show that Kinmen residents stand by their reputation of being independent.
John Yu is a civil servant.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS