Georgia’s approach toward Russia and China represents a “choice of sides” by the government, led by the populist Georgian Dream (GD) party. To understand how and why Tbilisi has opted for joining the Chinese-Russian axis, it is important to mention some important facts.
First of all, GD’s alleged positive stance towards the EU was always contradicted by the statements and political decisions of its leadership. In terms of values and actions, the Georgian government holds a significantly different position from those of the EU Parliament and Commission.
One example is LGBTQ+ rights, with the GD’s posture clearly resembling that of Moscow or Beijing rather than that of Paris or Berlin. The Georgian ruling party’s stance on this issue can be seen in the recently approved “Law on the Protection of Family Values and Minors.”
This legislation imposes several restrictions on freedom of expression and assembly for queer people, bans legal procedures for gender recognition and gender reassignment surgeries, and introduces censorship in media and education.
In addition, the law reaffirms the ban on same-sex marriage, while outlawing alternative forms of civil union among non-heterosexual couples.
Georgia’s shift away from the West was exacerbated by the highly contested parliamentary elections last year, which were marred by independent reports of irregularities and voter intimidation.
The pro-western opposition refused to concede the results, accusing the government of derailing the country’s path to EU membership. Since then, it has started round-the-clock protests on the streets of Tbilisi calling for new elections.
However, the Georgian authorities’ use of draconian new laws — which criminalize even symbolic acts such as “placing stickers on public property” — as well as the Electoral College’s appointment of Mikheil Kavelashvili — famous for his anti-western statements — as the new president of Georgia is a clear signal of GD’s intentions moving forward.
The ruling party’s chosen path is significantly out of step with the Georgian citizens’ interests and desires, as further proved by a National Democratic Institute poll on the country’s accession to the EU, with almost 80 percent of Georgians wanting their country to become part of the EU, regardless of partisan affiliation.
By advancing laws aimed at promoting reactionary politics, Georgia triggered a widely expected negative response from the EU Commission. In October of last year, in fact, the executive arm of the EU decided not to recommend opening EU membership talks with Georgia unless it “changes course.”
As it moves away from the West, the Georgian government aims to advance the country’s strategic partnership with China. As the former Georgian prime minister Irakli Garibashvili said: “Georgia is committing itself to China’s BRI as well as a new security architecture,” referring to the Global Security Initiative proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
The strategic partnership document, signed by the parties in 2023, fits into the pattern of non-equal relations between Georgia and China.
On the one hand, it states that “Georgia firmly adheres to the ‘one China’ principle.” On the other hand, it fails to mention Georgia’s sovereignty over the two self-declared states of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
The reason behind this omission is China’s strategic relationship with Russia, the country that invaded Georgia in 2008 before declaring the two regions as sovereign states. While China is leveraging the relationship with Tbilisi for its own purposes, the latter is passively accepting a reality imposed on it by Beijing.
Georgia’s adherence to the “one China” principle, with no relationship between the two sides, was confirmed by then-minister of foreign affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) during an interview with RFE/RL’s Georgian Service in 2023. In that sense, he pointed out that “there is no practical, substantive or real relationship with Georgia.”
Whereas Taipei was determined to “communicate with the help of business leaders or through other channels,” as Wu said, the Georgian government made it clear that “they won’t engage with Taiwan.”
As it distances itself from the EU and the US, Georgia becomes increasingly dependent and vulnerable in its relationship with China. This leads to a situation in which China holds the power to impose its agenda on the South Caucasian state.
Georgia’s policies in many areas, such as the economy, civil rights and diplomacy, are the inevitable evidence of the leadership’s willingness to engage with radically different geopolitical actors to attain short-term goals at the expense of long-standing relations with the West.
Michele Maresca is an analyst at the online international law journal Il Caffe Geopolitico and the think tank Geopol 21.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS