Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget.
The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed NT$2 billion budget — and up to 70 percent of ministerial expenses.
This week, the Legislative Yuan would continue to discuss and vote on the central government’s total budget, as well as hundreds of proposals by KMT and TPP lawmakers to cut specific items.
Although it is within the Legislative Yuan’s power to freeze or cut the government’s budget, the reasons opposition party lawmakers put forward for their budget proposals have generated a public backlash.
KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) submitted a motion to slash the entire NT$2.309 billion budget of Public Television Service (PTS) and its subsidiaries, claiming that the broadcaster only serves the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while other KMT legislators proposed cutting arts and culture grants. The motions were immediately denounced by leading figures in the film and arts industry, while academics launched a petition and urged recalls. KMT lawmakers later backed away from eliminating PTS’ budget allocation in favor of a more modest NT$23 million, or 1 percent, reduction.
Other cuts with absurd rationales include cutting the gender equity budget because “there were too many sexual assault cases”; cutting a ministry’s advertising budget because it has used “blue and white colors in its ‘extremely ugly’ ad picture, as if vilifying the KMT and TPP”; and cutting NT$200 million from the police budget to “effectively fight scams and fraud, so that people will not fall victim to scams.”
Opposition lawmakers have also proposed cutting NT$100 million for firefighters’ helmets and protective equipment due to “concerns that they would be used for war preparedness,” and cutting NT$400 million from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ budget, because “Honduras cut diplomatic ties with Taiwan.”
More people and organizations have voiced concerns over such proposals, which they said would drastically affect people’s livelihoods, public safety and social welfare.
However, the KMT and TPP do not seem to be worried about the public reaction. The two parties said the cuts are necessary to tighten supervision over the “corrupt” DPP and prevent it from spending money on propaganda to “attack the opposition” and “brainwash people.”
They pledged to pass further cuts this week.
After KMT and TPP lawmakers took a majority of the Legislative Yuan in February last year, they focused on expanding their legislative power in the first legislative session, but the Constitutional Court ruled that most of their bills were unconstitutional.
During the second session, the opposition legislators started taking more extreme retaliatory measures to paralyze the court and slash the government budget to incapacitate it.
If voters stay indifferent or silently endure the harm caused by the budget cuts, KMT and TPP lawmakers would only become more emboldened to disregard the Constitution. Chen last week called a director who questioned the PTS budget cut “a wicked servant bullying the master,” implying that it is the lawmakers who are masters. She has forgotten that she should be a “servant” serving the public humbly, not bullying those who question her.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS