The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Economic Work Conference in Beijing at the end of last year failed to find a solution for China’s economy. Although Chinese officials claimed that the foreign trade surplus hit a record high last month, China’s and Hong Kong’s stock markets have kept tumbling this year, with the latter’s Hang Seng Index dropping below 19,000 points on Monday.
While being stuck with the downturn, there is good news for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who visited Macau at the end of last year to celebrate the 25th anniversary of China‘s takeover of the territory in 1999. Surprisingly, Xi stayed there for three days.
Why is Xi fond of Macau? Because Macau is so obedient that it is considered a role model of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” policy. Macau has long been a “quasi-liberated zone” with a booming gambling industry.
The new chief executive, Sam Hou Fai (岑浩輝), was born in China’s Guangdong Province, educated in China, graduated from the Law School of prestigious Peking University, and emigrated to Macau in 1986. Sam is one of the elites with Chinese experience, also known as the “13 gangsters” (13太保), trained by Beijing to rule Macau. This is why Xi was so at ease during his stay in Macau.
Since the COVID-19 pandemic came to an end, Macau’s gambling and tourism industries have recovered much more quickly than Hong Kong’s.
In contrast to Hong Kong’s fiscal deficit, Macau with its strong treasury and budget surplus has been passing money to its people for 18 consecutive years. This year, each permanent resident would be given 10,000 Macau patacas (US$1,247), while each non-permanent resident would receive 6,000 patacas.
In Macau, the Chinese president repeatedly talked about economic development and put forward a number of specific expectations, including a call for “precise positioning, focusing on key points” — which referred to the gambling industry — and cultivation of new sectors with international competitiveness.
However, Tam Yiu-chung (譚耀宗), a former Hong Kong member of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, said that it is not easy for Macau to promote economic diversity and shift away from the monopoly of its gambling industry.
Tam added that that he believed that Beijing would conduct studies on Macau’s situation, and then support Macau in implementing them.
What new industries exactly does Macau want to develop? According to the Hong Kong media’s latest report on Jan. 13, Macau’s six largest gambling enterprises are opening overseas offices one after another in a bid to attract international customers.
A week earlier, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (新濠博亞娛樂) announced that it has opened an office in Bangkok, Thailand, to keep an eye out for new opportunities and possible cooperation. It seems that the gambling industry is still the best way to go.
In terms of Hong Kong’s “one country, two systems,” the only remnant today is late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) nine-word motto: “Horses would still run, stocks would still sizzle, and dancing would still continue” (馬照跑，股照炒，舞照跳), and the first two are related to gambling too.
As the CCP attempts to impose “one country, two systems” in Taiwan, does it want to try out the gambling industry in Taiwan’s outlying island Kinmen first?
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated bv Eddy Chang
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has formally announced his intention to stand for permanent party chairman. He has decided that he is the right person to steer the fledgling third force in Taiwan’s politics through the challenges it would certainly face in the post-Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) era, rather than serve in a caretaker role while the party finds a more suitable candidate. Huang is sure to secure the position. He is almost certainly not the right man for the job. Ko not only founded the party, he forged it into a one-man political force, with himself
RSS