US president-elect Donald Trump’s silly season has already caused irreparable damage to US national security. Despite not yet holding office for a minute, Trump has made it plain that in his second term the US will be an unreliable partner swayed by his personal whim, that he has no respect for historic alliances and that he has contempt for the rules-based international order that the US has led since the end of World War II to prevent the re-emergence of catastrophic great-power collisions.
Beginning with his “Merry Christmas to all” post on social media that he wanted to seize the Panama Canal, Canada and Greenland, Trump has not relented in his absurd claims, extended to renaming the Gulf of Mexico the “Gulf of America.” His disdain for the sovereignty of independent nations — two of them NATO allies and Panama a fellow member of the Organization of American States — has undermined the credibility of opposition to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and China’s ambition to grab Taiwan.
The soft power of the US, ultimately based on its democratic example and respect for international order, has been tossed away by Trump’s fantasy “manifest destiny” that is simply the latest wrinkle in his isolationism.
Illustration: Mountain People
Hardly the rough rider, if Trump were acting as Russian President Vladimir Putin’s or Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) agent, he could not have kowtowed more for their benefit.
Some have suggested that Trump contrives his ludicrous claims as a distraction from his broken campaign promise to bring down prices that was the central basis for his election.
“Inflation will vanish completely,” he pledged.
Time and again, he stated: “We’re going to bring those prices way down.”
Then, on Dec. 12, he revealed that the core of his campaign was false all along.
“It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up,” he said. “You know, it’s very hard.”
He also acknowledged that his tariffs could spike inflation.
“I can’t guarantee anything. I can’t guarantee tomorrow,” he said.
Oh, and in his one truthful statement: “Things do change.”
One of Trump’s changes since the election in his endless three-card monte game is making Greenland into his new frontier, for “national security.”
As a matter of fact, the US military has operated its northernmost base in the arctic circle, the Pituffik Space Base, formerly the Thule air base, in Greenland, absolutely rent-free in cooperation with the NATO partner since 1951.
Some speculate that Trump is engaging in former US president Richard Nixon’s deliberately staged “madman” theory of intimidating people into accepting his terms, whatever those might be. Still others wonder if it is all performative to keep his masses entertained with the show. His grandiosity is certainly a constant expression of his malignant narcissism.
Attributing his atavisms of imperialism and blunt-force tariffs to a thought through theoretical exercise to return to the 19th century invents an intellectual acuity that does not exist.
On the other hand, it might just be that Trump is the susceptible one who repeats half-baked ideas he hears from billionaires richer than himself over burned steak at Mar-a-Lago — in one ear and out his mouth without mental filtration and reasons added afterward like ketchup. The notion of purchasing Greenland, for example, originally was raised to him by Republican Party funder and cosmetics heir Ronald Lauder, an important art collector, including of German art of the Weimar period, who ought to know better than to be so irresponsible as to dangle a shiny object before Trump’s hooded eyes.
Trump’s latest and inevitably doomed chief of staff Susie Wiles will be doing her job as his handler only if she can lock Trump in a soundless isolation booth.
“God help us,” said former general John Kelly, a previous victim in the line of his helpless chiefs of staff, who ended up concluding that Trump is instinctively a “fascist,” about the prospect of a Trump second term.
However, if Trump’s dream were actually to come to pass, it would break the US’ political polarization and install Democratic governments for generations.
Trump envisions Canada, the whole country, as “the 51st state,” but Canada has 10 provinces and three territories. For Canada to become part of the US, its parliament, consisting of a Senate and House of Commons, would have to dissolve its federal nation.
Moreover, it would have to end its connection to the Commonwealth of Nations of 56 independent countries that were British colonies still bound by economic and political cooperation.
Canada could forgo leaving the Commonwealth if, as the price of admission to the US, the US as a former colony joined, but that would require a constitutional amendment to acknowledge that King Charles III as head of the Commonwealth and the de facto rebuke of the US’ Declaration of Independence.
Canada’s admission into the US would come with at least 10 new states. That would mean the US Senate would add 20 new members and the US House of Representatives about 57. In short, the US Congress would become reliably Democratic by an insurmountable margin far into the future.
Canadian style national healthcare would be one of the first items on the agenda.
Trump is easily the most unpopular public figure in Canada. If Canadians had been allowed to vote in last year’s election, US Vice President Kamala Harris would have beaten him by a three to one margin, a Canadian poll showed.
Only 13 percent of Canadians wish to become part of Trump’s US.
Another poll showed that the news stories that make the majority “angriest” are about Trump winning the election and his proposal for tariffs.
If Trump were somehow to annex Greenland, a self-ruling autonomous part of Denmark, would it become a state? And why not? With a population of 56,000, the factor of its disparity in relation to Wyoming, with about 584,000 people, is only 10 times smaller, while Wyoming’s population is 66 times smaller than California’s, while it still receives two senators and one representative. Could admission as a state of the District of Columbia, whose population is about one-fifth greater than Wyoming’s, then continue to be stymied? That would add two more Democratic senators and a representative.
The state of Greenland would naturally increase the Democratic majorities. The prime minister, Mute Egede, also head of the Inuit Party, is a socialist in the European social democratic tradition. The Inuit tribe comprises the bulk of the Greenland population. Egede favors full independence for Greenland.
In the face of Trump’s bluster, Egede has taken a statesmanlike approach. His government released a calming statement.
“Greenland looks forward to working with the incoming US administration and other NATO allies to ensure security and stability in the arctic region,” it said.
The Greenland leader’s tone sharply contrasts not only with Trump’s, but with the Republicans on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who posted a jingoist outburst on Wednesday last week.
“Our country was built by warriors and explorers. We tamed the West, won two World Wars, and were the first to plant our flag on the moon. President Trump has the biggest dreams for America and it’s un-American to be afraid of big dreams,” they wrote.
This compressed historical illiteracy culminating in the seizure of Canada and Greenland, and castigating criticism as treason, was too embarrassing even for House Republicans, who deleted the message shortly after it was posted.
Trump’s Canada and Greenland escapade is a reverse twist on the plot of the 1959 satirical movie The Mouse That Roars starring Peter Sellers. In that screwball comedy, the Duchy of Grand Fenwick declares war on the US to receive its munificent financial support. Through a series of ridiculous circumstances, the duchy gains control of a doomsday bomb, the Q-Bomb, becomes the greatest power in the world and the superpowers disarm their nuclear weapons.
The bomb is really nothing but a dud, but that is kept a secret.
Peter Sellers plays the Duchess Gloriana XII, Prime Minister Count Rupert Mountjoy and General Tully Bascombe. Unfortunately, Sellers, who died in 1980, is unavailable to play three of Trump’s Cabinet nominees.
Sidney Blumenthal is a former senior adviser to former US president Bill Clinton and former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS