On Jan. 6, Indonesia was officially accepted as a full member of the BRICS group. While this development might not have a direct or immediate impact on Taiwan, it could shift the geopolitical dynamics in the Asia-Pacific region.
First, BRICS, as an economic bloc, harbors diverse geopolitical interests among its member states. China considers Taiwan an “inseparable part of its territory,” and Brazil, Russia, India and South Africa generally support the “one China” policy, although not all actively endorse China’s stance on Taiwan.
Indonesia’s membership in BRICS brings Jakarta closer to China’s economic diplomacy, which might influence Indonesia’s approach to sensitive issues, including Taiwan.
Second, Indonesia’s accession to BRICS presents an opportunity for China, a key player in the bloc, to strengthen its regional influence, particularly in Southeast Asia. If China uses the BRICS platform to reinforce its diplomatic narrative on Taiwan, this could complicate the position of countries in the region, including Indonesia, in remaining neutral on Taiwan.
Despite Indonesia’s non-aligned diplomatic tradition, joining BRICS could create indirect pressure from China to align more closely with its agenda. Taiwan has sought to foster informal and economic ties with Southeast Asian countries through the New Southbound Policy. However, Indonesia’s membership in BRICS might diminish Taiwan’s opportunities to strengthen bilateral relations with Indonesia and other Southeast Asian nations, especially if Indonesia’s economic cooperation with China deepens.
Third, Indonesia in BRICS brings the bloc closer to Southeast Asia, especially with countries such as Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam serving as BRICS partners. With an increased BRICS presence in Southeast Asia, Taiwan might face challenges in maintaining its relevance and diplomatic space in the region, particularly if Indonesia chooses to support more pro-China policies.
Fourth, Taiwan is a major player in the global semiconductor industry. At the same time, BRICS, particularly China and India, are striving to enhance their technological independence, including in the semiconductor sector.
Indonesia in BRICS could open up opportunities for technological cooperation with China and India. This could lead to more competition with Taiwan.
These concerns might be overstated when considering Indonesia’s “free-active” diplomacy principle, which enables the country to maintain good relations with all parties, including Taiwan.
Indonesia has never had official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, but it has consistently maintained strong economic ties.
As a relatively neutral member of BRICS, Indonesia has an opportunity to play a mediating role in sensitive regional issues, including tensions between China and Taiwan.
Taiwan must ensure that its relationship with Indonesia remains strong, particularly in the economic and trade sectors. Taiwan could enhance its investments in strategic sectors such as renewable energy and technology, which align with Indonesia’s development priorities.
Taiwan needs to adopt a flexible diplomatic approach to maintain its relevance in the region, perhaps by focusing on non-political cooperation in areas such as education, technology and healthcare. Taiwan’s economic ties with Indonesia still hold significant potential, if the two sides could separate geopolitical issues from their bilateral cooperation.
Najamuddin Khairur Rijal is an associate professor in the International Relations Department of the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia.
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
RSS