The latest foreign trade data released by the Ministry of Finance on Thursday last week showed that Taiwan’s exports for the whole of last year grew 9.9 percent year-on-year to US$475.07 billion, the second-highest on record after US$479.41 billion in 2022.
The result came as exports last month recorded better-than-expected 9.2 percent annual growth — also the 14th consecutive month of increases — at US$43.59 billion, thanks to strong demand for products involving high-performance computing and artificial intelligence (AI), as well as a surge in orders placed with Taiwanese businesses ahead of the Lunar New Year holiday and US president-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration, the ministry said.
Among the major markets, exports to China (including Hong Kong) decreased 1.1 percent year-on-year to US$150.62 billion, the third consecutive year of decline. The ministry said this phenomenon is unprecedented, adding that the proportion of exports to China (including Hong Kong) dropped to 31.7 percent of total exports, a 23-year low.
The data also showed that Taiwan’s trade surplus with China and Hong Kong hit an eight-year low last year at US$69.996 billion, and the gap between the trade surplus with China and Hong Kong and the US$64.88 billion with the US was the smallest in 32 years.
Among major export markets, the US and ASEAN ranked second and third-largest, with shipments of US$111.37 billion and US$87.79 billion respectively, up 46.1 percent and 15.1 percent from the previous year each. Europe and Japan ranked fourth and fifth, but shipments to the two markets fell 8.6 percent and 17.8 percent to US$38.64 billion and US$25.84 billion respectively, the data showed.
Shipments to South Korea increased 14.2 percent to US$20.79 billion last year, with the country replacing Japan as Taiwan’s largest trade deficit country. That is due to South Korea becoming a main supplier of electronic components, such as high-bandwidth memory chips, to local AI developers.
Meanwhile, Taiwan’s trade deficit with South Korea reached US$22.92 billion last year, surpassing the deficit with Japan — US$20.63 billion last year — for the first time.
What deserves attention is that Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US jumped 83.53 percent year-on-year to US$64.88 billion in the year — reaching 23.4 percent of Taiwan’s total exports, the highest in 24 years — which increases the chances of the nation becoming a target of tariffs proposed by the incoming Trump administration.
Recent reports that Trump is considering declaring a national economic emergency by using the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) to push his tariff plans through have only added to market uncertainty.
Under the IEEPA, Trump would be allowed to rapidly designate tariff rates and discuss tariff imposition with US Customs and Border Protection authorities.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs’ preliminary assessment found that the move would affect Taiwan’s auto parts, high-end servers, laptops and desktops destined for the US market.
It remains unclear how soon Trump’s declaration could occur, but for the most part, it would likely be a negotiating tool to exert diplomatic pressure, as in 2019 when Trump during his first term used it to address illegal immigration from Mexico.
Potential Trump tariffs might have a relatively manageable impact on Taiwan’s trade position — across-the-board tariffs require US Congress approval and would only come after negotiations and trade investigations. However, risks still abound from possible retaliatory tariffs by other countries to counter the US’ actions, which would affect global trade and thus harm export-reliant Taiwan.
As Trump’s tariff threat looms, the economic and political consequences warrant a rethink.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then