Indonesia is not taking a step back from its hardball approach to Apple. The showdown has turned into quite a spectacle, but it is unlikely the wins would be sustainable.
The tug-of-war has raged for months after Jakarta said in October last year that it would block the sale of iPhone 16s in the country because Apple had not met local investment requirements. This week, the government said it was upholding the ban and demanded further negotiations — despite greenlighting Apple’s proposal to set up an AirTag factory on the island of Batam just a day prior.
The US tech giant has remained silent about how the talks were progressing. Indonesia has not. Various leaks have claimed that the country refused to repeal the iPhone prohibition even after Apple coughed up investment offers worth US$10 million, US$100 million and, most recently, US$1 billion. Officials also reportedly altered the terms of their demands and then called for Apple senior executives to meet with Indonesian Minister of Industry Agus Gumiwang Kartasasmita. After landing in Jakarta, they were told the minister was not available.
Indonesia’s strong-arming appears to have reaped some victories. However, it has also exposed what a costly headache it is for foreign companies to navigate the regulatory red tape required to operate within its borders. This could backfire, as competition for tech investment in the region grows, and competitors such as Vietnam and Malaysia position themselves as more attractive options.
Apple accounted for just 1 percent of the Indonesian smartphone market as of the third quarter of last year, according to data from research firm Canalys. Some 80 percent of the market is dominated by devices that cost under US$200, a much lower price point than Apple’s marquee lineup. The company might have the resources to play the long game and navigate the many hoops the government is forcing it to jump through. However, others keeping tabs on the drama might be discouraged by the many hurdles, even if their lower-cost options are a better fit for the country’s market.
Still, Apple is wise to stick it out for the chance to unlock longer-term growth in the world’s fourth most-populous country that has more active cell phones than people. Shipments to the archipelago, with its young and tech-savvy population, are forecast to grow at a significantly higher clip than the global rate. As this saga drags on, Chinese premium brand Honor, a spinoff of Huawei Technologies, announced it was entering Indonesia. The cheekily timed foray into the market is not related to the iPhone 16 ban, an Honor executive has said.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s government needs to be more strategic. The looming threat of fresh tariffs on goods from China following Donald Trump’s election victory has handed it more leverage to lure Apple to further diversify its supply chains.
His administration seems to be taking issue with the fact that Apple has offered to support an AirTag factory in the country, instead of components that are directly related to the banned smartphone. It lays bare a recurring obstacle for foreign firms identified by the American Chamber of Commerce in Indonesia: The gulf between the government demands regarding local production and the capabilities and infrastructure it has to support high-tech manufacturing.
Some companies have achieved compliance with the local production requirements the easy way. They have brought some packaging, charger cables, headsets and accessories production to the country. However, this does not move Indonesia up the tech value chain or support its own industry.
Policymakers should eradicate red tape and enforce regulations more clearly. They must also take strategic steps to improve infrastructure and upskill the labor force to create a sustainable high-tech manufacturing ecosystem. Vietnam and Malaysia have made focused efforts to lure investments and have seen major success, despite having consumer bases that are a fraction of the size. Indonesia only has one Apple supplier, according to its most recent list, compared to 35 in Vietnam and 19 in Malaysia.
This conflict goes beyond just iPhone sales in the country. Emerging markets such as Indonesia have become battlegrounds for the broader US-China tech rivalry. Four of the top five smartphone makers in the Southeast Asian nation are Chinese companies (and the fifth is South Korea’s Samsung Electronics).
As Chinese money and tech influence spikes, so has the nation’s popularity. More than 73 percent of citizens say they would prefer to align with Beijing over Washington if forced to choose. It should be a wake-up call for US policymakers that even as it is moving toward a breakup from Chinese tech, the rest of the world is increasingly relying on it.
For Jakarta, there is a limit to how many more victories it can eke out by holding its vast consumer base hostage from tech companies or forcing businesses into decisions that do not make economic sense. Reaching a truce with Apple would signal to the world that it is an attractive destination for firms looking for an alternative to China.
Catherine Thorbecke is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech. Previously she was a tech reporter at CNN and ABC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS