During a recent staff meeting at school, some teachers proposed installing surveillance cameras in every classroom on the campus to address a recent incident. Some students had written offensive words on the blackboard to insult the teachers, and no one admitted to guilt. There was no way to find out who the culprits were.
Some teachers said installing security cameras could deter students from engaging in inappropriate behavior. They believe that in cases of property loss, students obstructing classroom discipline, bullying and contravention of the Gender Equity Education Act (性別平等教育法), surveillance footage would reveal the truth.
If it is really that beneficial, it is perhaps curious that there is not even a single classroom with a security camera installed, with the exception of kindergartens.
Ministry of Education regulations on surveillance cameras in schools say that to maintain campus safety and to safeguard personal privacy, surveillance cameras are mainly installed at campus entrances and exits, corridors, stairway corners and walkway corners.
There are no surveillance cameras in restrooms even though they are black spots for school accidents. One notorious example happened in 2000, when a 15-year-old boy, Yeh Yung-chih (葉永鋕), who had been bullied for years due to his alleged effeminate behavior, died in the school toilet, where the bullies had attacked him.
However, installing surveillance cameras in school washrooms would infringe on students’ personal privacy. Therefore, security cameras could only be installed at the entrance of a restroom, but never inside.
Those who support installing security cameras in classrooms might say that teachers and students who are opposed to the idea have a guilty conscience — they are afraid that their inappropriate behavior would be exposed.
If that argument is valid, then the same reasoning could apply to installing surveillance cameras pointed at teachers’ desks. If teachers do not loaf around, why would they be afraid of being watched by a security camera?
We should all be sympathetic regarding the privacy issue. When you browse the Internet, you would not want other people to stare at your computer screen to see what you are looking at even if it is not a questionable Web site. There is, after all, a reasonable expectation of privacy.
When teachers are not teaching classes, they should be able to feel at ease in the office. Stretching their feet when the weather is hot, picking their noses or scratching an itch are no big deal, but what if you have a surveillance camera pointed at you? How would you feel? Would you still be able to relax? People should be able to have a reasonable expectation of privacy even in public venues.
There are pros and cons of installing surveillance cameras in classrooms. Taking protecting personal privacy into consideration, it should not be done hastily, especially since no consensus has been reached and parents have not given their consent.
Protecting teachers and students is just a sugarcoated excuse to install surveillance cameras and cover up the malicious intention of infringing on others’ privacy.
Lin Cheng-wu is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Fion Khan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS