The National Health Insurance (NHI) budget for this year is to be increased by a record 5.5 percent to NT$928.62 billion (US$28.17 billion), hitting the ceiling approved by the Executive Yuan and surpassing the negotiated version.
Many medical institutions are relieved by this outcome.
However, the Taiwan Healthcare Reform Foundation and the National Health Insurance Civic Surveillance Alliance said that the budget increase was “asking for 50 cents and getting a dollar.”
They even went so far as to demand an investigation into whether Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源) is involved in corruption or otherwise contravening the law.
The Health Care Index by Country provided by online database Numbeo had Taiwan ranked first globally for the sixth consecutive year last year. Taiwan has ranked first on the list 12 times, surpassing Japan and South Korea.
However, long-term underfunding has led to a number of setbacks in the NHI system.
Reimbursement rates have fallen to between 70 and 80 percent, leading to a shortage of staff in many medical institutions as well as a reduction in services. A decrease in available hospital beds means that many people are unable to be admitted to emergency rooms due to overcrowding, while operating room hours have been limited.
Even members of the Legislative Yuan — regardless of party affiliation — have recognized the severity of the situation and have resolved to adjust the “floating point value” — a number used to calculate the reimbursement rate to healthcare facilities for medical services — in the NHI scheme to NT$0.95 by June 30.
Civil groups are genuine in their efforts to monitor increases in NHI expenditure, but it is also worth considering whether methods should be proposed to encourage the public to more reasonably utilize the NHI system, as its unrestricted nature has led to overly expansive coverage.
The lack of restrictions on medical referrals allows for direct and unlimited access to medical centers, like an all-you-can-eat outpatient buffet. As a result, the burden of increased health insurance costs has fallen entirely on medical institutions.
Such unequal oversight calls for serious re-evaluation.
The health insurance budgets of many countries operate on a system where medical services cease to be offered once the funding is used up. Such a practice often leads many medical consultations, tests, surgeries and so on to be delayed until the start of the next budget cycle. People must often wait months or even years as a result.
Taiwan is the only place in the world that allows unlimited access to healthcare, while medical institutions shoulder the expenses under the NHI budget system.
Hidden beneath the surface of the better than 90 percent satisfaction rate of the NHI system, Taiwan’s medical institutions are bleeding internally from withheld payments, deductions, reduced reimbursement rates and rejected claims.
If the Ministry of Health and Welfare fails to consider increasing the NHI budget, how can it expect to meet the requirements of the Legislative Yuan’s resolution?
Without a budget increase, how would the nation’s medical institutions survive?
There is no such thing as a free lunch. No matter how capable the minister is, the country’s medical system cannot meet its high demand efficiently and effectively without adequate funding.
Lin Yung-zen is the director of the Taiwan Primary Care Association.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS