Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) proposed recalling Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and 41 lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
However, civil society groups have already initiated campaigns to recall several lawmakers. Would Ker’s call trigger a nationwide recall movement? That is not realistic, nor would it yield positive results. The DPP has fewer seats than the KMT, which holds a majority in the legislature together with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP).
Ker is known for his negotiating techniques. He is either confident he would win or just chanting a slogan. He was also confident during the legislative speaker election last year when he said TPP Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) was “the female version of Han” and voted for the DPP’s candidate. I thought he had negotiated with the opposition to secure votes for the DPP. However, that was not the case and Han was elected as speaker. Has the situation improved enough that the DPP would succeed in recalling Han?
Some KMT legislators have strong holds in their respective districts, such as in Kinmen and Lienchiang counties. It would be a difficult to initiate a recall campaign, as not much that could be done with the limited manpower of civic group volunteers. Would it not be better to concentrate our efforts on recalling the most unpopular KMT legislators than spread ourselves too thin?
Focus should be placed on exposing the identities of those who collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and coerce others to do so. Those with few supporters should also be recalled. Even if the recall fails, they would experience a severe setback and learn a lesson.
Initiating a mass recall would only incite hatred, polarize our society and trigger confrontation, instead of fostering unity. It is not something the ruling DPP or other democratic countries would like to see.
There are still options. The Presidential Office and the Executive Yuan are willing to negotiate with Han to seek a way out, which Han is not opposed to. Why deprive ourselves of that?
President William Lai (賴清德) said the passing of the three controversial bills contravenes the principle of separation of powers and deviates from the true meaning of “by the people.” He emphasized that democratic disputes should be resolved with even greater democracy, and hoped there could be more efforts to safeguard Taiwan.
If negotiation does not yield results, that “greater democracy” could be a referendum or a mass recall. A referendum is less confrontational and more universal, as every voter could participate and every vote is counted equally. It represents the public opinion. While preparing for the referendum, no one has the right to stop a small-scale recall movement initiated by civil society.
When the DPP held a majority in the legislature, amendments to the National Security Act (國家安全法) were negotiated for many years. Although the bill was passed, the act is still not comprehensive. Now that the DPP is the minority party, Ker, known as the “king of negotiation,” should give full play to his abilities instead of taking things to extremes.
Taiwan’s economy is flourishing, with the artificial intelligence industry at its core. Meanwhile, people in China are living in the direst of circumstances, which is why the CCP is picking quarrels and provoking Taiwan to shift public attention.
Taiwanese should be aware of the circumstances. While US president-elect Donald Trump is “making America great again,” Taiwanese should make Taiwan great again.
Paul Lin is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Translated by Fion Khan
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS