US president-elect Donald Trump’s nomination of Elbridge Colby as US undersecretary of defense for policy — a pivotal role in advising and supporting the US secretary of defense on strategy, planning and international alliances — is positive news for Taiwan and signals that the US is prioritizing regional and global stability in its foreign policy, which should be welcomed across the political aisle.
Colby, who Trump nominated on Dec. 23 last year and if confirmed by the US Senate would become the No. 3 official in the Pentagon, is a leading proponent of the US implementing the “pivot to Asia” that was first announced by then-US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton in 2011, but never realized as successive US administrations became distracted by wars in Europe and the Middle East.
The pivot “foundered on the shoals of execution,” wrote foreign policy analysts Robert Blackwill and Richard Fontaine, an intellectual ally of Colby, in their recent book Lost Decade: The US Pivot to Asia and the Rise of Chinese Power.
Colby served in the Pentagon during Trump’s first administration and led the development of the 2018 National Defense Strategy, a paradigm-shifting document that changed the focus of US grand strategy from combating terrorism to “inter-state strategic competition.”
“It is increasingly clear that China and Russia want to shape a world consistent with their authoritarian model — gaining veto authority over other nations’ economic, diplomatic and security decisions,” the document said.
Since leaving the administration, Colby has become a leading advocate of the US prioritizing the threat China poses to US interests. Colby in his public speeches, media engagements and writings has been calling for the US to focus on Asia, while asking US European allies to take up more defense responsibility in their region to free up some of the US’ resources.
“Asia’s more important than Europe, China is more formidable than Russia, and the other European states are much stronger relative to Russia than the Asian ones are relative to China. Today, it’s clear as a bell that we should be focusing on Asia,” he told New Statesman writer Sohrab Ahmari in July last year.
In Colby’s book The Strategy of Denial: American Defense in an Age of Great Power Conflict, published in 2021 and which offers a grand strategy framework for the US in the context of China’s growing power, he said the main purpose of the US’ grand strategy should be to prevent China’s dominance of Asia, which means fashioning an “anti-hegemonic coalition” of US allies to safeguard the “status quo” in the region that has been the bedrock of peace, stability and prosperity over the past few decades.
“Regional hegemony can be denied to a state such as China if enough states in or active in the key region can league together to wield more power than the aspiring hegemon [China],” he wrote.
Colby’s appointment likely means Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and other allies would be asked to spend more on their defenses, as part of an anti-hegemonic coalition, which would help the democratic alliance restore a balance of power and contain Beijing’s revisionism.
Colby has long advocated that Taiwan increase its defense spending. In an op-ed in the Taipei Times in May last year, he called on the nation to spend 5 percent of its GDP on defense, citing how Poland and Israel, which face fewer existential threats, spend more than 4 percent.
With an incoming US administration seeking to revitalize the alliance system, the executive and legislative branches should be ready to deepen communication with the US and ensure that internal divisions do not hinder the nation from reaching its defense commitments.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS