On Monday evening, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced his resignation as leader of the Liberal Party, but would stay on as prime minister until a successor is selected. He had been in office since November 2015. At the end of last year — as a result of an economic downturn and a series of political scandals — his approval rating plummeted to an unprecedented low of 33 percent, leading to intense criticism from within the party. Faced with immense pressure on all sides, Trudeau was left with no choice but to step down.
Like many countries straining under the weight of inflation in the past few years, during Trudeau’s administration, Canada faced new records for inflation. Housing prices in major cities such as Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal have soared by as much as 30 to 40 percent in the past few years — a source of great hardship for Canadians. Several years ago, one of my Canadian clients lamented gas prices that were rising for no apparent reason, leaving them at a loss for what to do.
Meanwhile, Trudeau was repeatedly exposed for accepting luxurious vacations from his corporate friends. Close family members were revealed to have accepted thousands of US dollars in “rewards” from the charitable organization WE Charity — which had signed lucrative contracts with Trudeau’s administration — as payment for attending charity events. The payments appeared to be kickbacks. All of this irreparably damaged Trudeau’s reputation.
In contrast, Taiwan has controlled inflation quite well — unlike Canada and the US, where public dissatisfaction has led to the resignation of a prime minister and the return of former US president Donald Trump.
The housing market is quite an intriguing issue. About 15 years ago, a client of mine in Vancouver told me that housing prices had reached sky-high levels thanks to Chinese immigrants. It is quite a relief that the Taiwanese government has imposed restrictions on Chinese investment to protect Taiwan’s real-estate market from Chinese Communist Party influence. Otherwise, the consequences for Taiwan could have been even worse than in Canada.
In light of Trudeau’s resignation, many foreign media outlets took the opportunity to mention Trump — who is to be inaugurated on Jan. 20 — and his threat to impose a 25 percent tariff on Canadian goods. Trump also mocked Trudeau last month, referring to him as the “governor” of the “Great State of Canada” rather than prime minister, implying that Canada is a US state. That was the straw that broke the camel’s back, as it became clear Trudeau had lost ground in the realm of foreign diplomacy.
Canada is the largest trading partner of the US — the largest economy in the world. Despite this, severe inflation and skyrocketing prices led the public to lose its faith in the government. For Taiwan — the US’ eighth-largest trading partner — this should serve as a cautionary tale. Aside from bolstering ties with the US, economic stability and political integrity are two factors essential to earning the public’s trust.
Fang Fu-chuan is an international trader.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS