Our opponent is not a competitor, but an enemy. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is using the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) coalition to “control Taiwan by using Taiwan” to achieve its goal of unification.
The enemy has launched a battle of unrestricted warfare — a total war that leaves Taiwanese, who uphold the democratic ideal that sovereignty rests with the people, with nowhere to turn. It would be foolish of us to continue using a limited-war mindset to respond to their tactics.
Pretentiously touting “values” and “neutrality” only allows those with extremist ideas to take advantage of the situation, bringing disaster to the nation. The CCP, KMT and TPP are using an indirect democratic majority to contravene the public’s sovereign rights, undermining the self-determination of Taiwanese on their own land. How could human rights be traded under majority rule? Even if both sides were to agree, human rights are not market commodities to be bought and sold. If one fails to understand the meaning of freedom in democratic thought, pursuing justice on behalf of the public is out of the question.
Therefore, a mass recall movement is an appropriate solution. The KMT and TPP are no longer loyal opposition parties. Their representatives no longer serve as a bridge connecting society with the nation — rather, they would become the butchers of societal values and national survival.
Taiwan’s democratic constitutional system is being gradually consumed by our enemies, internal and external. Civil society must demonstrate the power of self-determination. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) cannot remain neutral on this matter — it is imperative that it establishes partnerships with civil groups.
Democratic social movements should awaken the consciousness of self-determination in each member of the public, even those who voted for the KMT or TPP. They should also aim to disseminate true and accurate information to the international community to ensure that allies around the world do not misjudge the situation. Taiwanese should not merely sit back and watch as our democratic system fails. We want to decide the fate of our own land.
Lai Rung-wei is an assistant professor and former manager of a financial company’s investment research office.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS