Politics in Taiwan and South Korea have descended into chaos, resulting in tense standoffs, with one shared cause being the legislative majority wielded by the opposition parties in both countries.
Suspended South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol was impeached by opposition lawmakers for attempting to implement martial law.
President William Lai (賴清德) has shown he is unwilling to break laws or contravene the Constitution, despite the disregard of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) for the document. Lai is showing a lot of tolerance for the opposition parties and expressed in his New Year’s speech a willingness to use “greater democracy” to resolve issues.
What did he mean by that? The only feasible recourse for voters is recalls and elections.
Last year, after the legislature passed three proposals in a power grab aimed at impeding the proper implementation of the Constitution and judicial system, civil society rose up, launching “mass recall” demonstrations and recall petition signature drives in an attempt to remove 27 KMT legislators. On Feb. 1, those legislators are to face formal recalls.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) holds 51 seats in the legislature, while the KMT has 52, plus two KMT-aligned independents. The TPP has eight legislators-at-large, who cannot be recalled.
If the KMT loses three seats, the dynamic in the legislature could shift significantly.
TPP Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) essentially follows everything that KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) proposes, so the KMT-TPP opposition can be expected to continue meddling in Taiwan’s laws and institutions.
Overturning three KMT-held seats might not be enough: At least 11 KMT legislators would need to be recalled.
Mass recalls differ from individual recalls in that they seek to alter the wider political dynamic. In a sense, it matters little which lawmakers are targeted, as the entire KMT caucus acts en masse, toeing the party line. Fu is widely seen as the legislature’s most pro-Chinese Communist Party member and is considered to be carrying out the orders of Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧) and perhaps even Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The rest of the KMT simply follows suit.
Considering the electoral base Fu and his wife have built in Hualien County, it would be difficult to recall him directly. That is why civic groups have repeatedly said that recalling any KMT legislator would essentially be as good as recalling Fu himself.
The DPP has proposed recalling Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), while DPP legislative caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) has urged the recall of 39 KMT legislators and the two KMT-affiliated lawmakers. It seems the situation is coming to a head, which is a good thing.
In a democratic system, voters must have the right of recall. Under the chorus of voices calling for it, some KMT politicians seem to be showing restraint, but the TPP legislators continue to act arrogantly, crying foul about their former chairman, Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), being detained over his alleged involvement in financial scandals. They also continue to make unfounded claims that prosecutors are colluding with the central government in charging Ko and have been demonstrating in support of him.
They know they can behave like this, as they are not vulnerable to recall as legislators-at-large. Voters can still teach them a lesson by recalling their KMT taskmasters.
Susie Su is a Taiwanese living in Australia.
Translated by Tim Smith
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS