As investigators attempted to arrest South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol on Friday morning, his supporters gathered outside the presidential residence waving two national flags: the South Korean Taegukgi alongside the American Stars and Stripes.
To outsiders, the unexpected combination might seem baffling, but to Yoon’s supporters, the US represents more than an ally: It is a perceived ideal. The symbolism of the US flag is a declaration of a broader cultural and spiritual order they believe is under threat.
Holding both flags outside Yoon’s residence on Friday, 74-year-old Pyeong In-su said the police had to be stopped by “patriotic citizens” and he hoped US president-elect Donald Trump could come to Yoon’s aid.
“I hope after Trump’s inauguration he can use his influence to help our country get back on the right track,” he said, as he waved both flags with the message: “Let’s go together” in English and Korean.
While pro-Yoon groups criticize their opponents as being subservient to North Korea, they openly venerate the US.
They frequently remind followers that the US liberated Korea from Japanese colonial rule and defended it during the Korean War of 1950 to 1953, casting the US as a divine protector of democracy embedded in Christian values.
Over recent years, these groups, which remain a fringe element of South Korean society, have increasingly adopted rhetoric from the US right, particularly around claims of election fraud.
This narrative has intensified since Yoon’s short-lived declaration of martial law last month, which he justified by claiming electoral manipulation and the presence of “pro-North Korean, anti-state forces” — actions that led to his impeachment and arrest warrant.
With echoes of claims of election denial movements in the US, a Korea Research poll released last week showed that 65 percent of Yoon’s conservative People Power Party supporters believe the parliamentary elections in April last year were fraudulent, despite only 29 percent of the general public sharing this view.
The elections saw the opposition parties including the Democratic party win a decisive victory, securing 192 seats in the 300-seat parliament. No major election observers or court has raised concerns about the vote, with fraud claims debunked as unsubstantiated.
Regardless, the allegations have been amplified through a network of far-right YouTube channels, where conservative commentators livestream the rallies and promote a wide range of conspiracy theories.
These online echo chambers, which Yoon himself has been accused of relying on for information, have become key platforms for spreading unfounded claims and maintaining supporter morale.
In South Korea and the US, similar tactics have been observed: questioning election integrity, claiming moral authority through religious values and portraying political opponents as enemies of the state.
The unlikely links between the movements can be traced back to the rise in evangelical Protestant churches in South Korea, which form the backbone of Yoon’s most ardent support base.
Many of these churches were founded by Christians who fled communist persecution in North Korea before the Korean War, embedding a fierce anti-communist ideology into their religious identity.
These churches, including the influential Sarang Jeil Church led by populist pastor Jeon Gwang-hoon, hold regular rallies in central Seoul’s Gwanghwamun Square to denounce any opposition as “communist forces” who deserve the death penalty.
Their weekly gatherings often feature simultaneous English translation on stage and livestreams targeting US audiences, with US bank account details displayed for international donations.
The impeached leader has also tapped into the messaging. On New Year’s Day, Yoon himself reinforced their narrative in a defiant message to supporters, warning of “forces infringing on sovereignty” while vowing to “fight until the end.” He admitted to watching their YouTube broadcasts.
At Friday’s rally outside his residence, protesters held banners in Korean claiming “election fraud” and in English, “Stop The Steal.” When asked for specific evidence of electoral manipulation, none could answer.
Raphael Rashid is a Seoul-based freelance journalist and author of The Korea We Refuse to See.
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS