The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has expended considerable resources to source Taiwanese online influencers willing to collaborate on “united front” propaganda videos and other pro-China multimedia projects, with the intent of influencing Taiwanese and politics.
Beijing must be wondering if it needed to go through all that effort after hearing Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Weng Hsiao-ling’s (翁曉玲) statements at the legislature to Presidential Office Secretary-General Pan Men-an (潘孟安).
Why cultivate pro-CCP online influencers when there are already people in positions of power such as Weng doing Beijing’s bidding? Her spouting CCP talking points in the legislature would pay the CCP far more dividends than having to resort to online influencers.
That said, when it is time to go to the polls for next year’s local elections, the Democratic Progressive Party would only need to replay video clips of Weng making her pro-China speeches. The KMT might as well pack its bags and go home.
“If we affirm that the People’s Republic of China [PRC, China] territorial scope includes Taiwan, then what would be wrong about them recovering Taiwan?” Weng asked.
For a legislator-at-large serving in the legislature of the Republic of China to speak such nonsense after taking an oath to uphold and abide by the Constitution, how could she suddenly start repeating political stances held by a hostile state and then ask “what would be wrong” about Taiwan being “recovered” by China?
Such rhetoric and positioning borders on treason. The majority of Taiwanese cannot accept her words, let alone Pan.
The “recovery” being referred to is the belief that Taiwan is a “lost Chinese territory” that the CCP intends to “recover,” yet Taiwan has never been a part of China. It was never “lost” to begin with, so why would it ever need to be “recovered”?
The KMT’s past era of party-state rule emphasized opposing the CCP and recovering the “mainland,” couched in terms of an irrational “restoration” that realistically could never be achieved, as the KMT was defeated in China and exiled to Taiwan. They vowed to counterattack and recover the national territory “occupied” by the CCP. That was considered a dyed-in-the-wool position that could see someone labeled a traitor to Taiwan if they did not support it.
KMT political figures have long claimed in their own party charter that both sides of the Taiwan Strait would be unified. As for how they intend to forcibly marry off Taiwan to China, they want to remain in a twilight zone, adhering to the so-called “1992 consensus,” in which both sides “acknowledge there is one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
If Wang advocating the selling out of Taiwan were broadcast on the global stage, how would the US not reconsider whether to step in if the nation was claimed to be part of China and the “original” overlord wanted to “recover” it? Why would other countries bother sticking up for us?
With opposition lawmakers voicing such sentiments, our military, who have pledged to protect our national territory, could waver and capitulate to CCP-peddled defeatism. That would seriously impact our national security.
The government needs to swiftly and resoundingly refute such nonsense. The KMT has yet to distance itself from Weng’s absurdities. Does this mean they agree with or implicitly endorse what she is saying?
Chen Wen-ching works in environmental services.
Translated by Tim Smith
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS