Last year’s Romanian presidential election saw the rise of Calin Georgescu, an “independent” candidate who made it into the second round. His unexpected advance to the runoff election, where he was set to face pro-EU and pro-NATO Elena Lasconi, raised concerns among observers due to Georgescu’s favorable stance toward Russia.
As someone who was expected to receive minimal support in the first round, Georgescu ran on a political platform boosted by an enormous number of messages on social media, notably on TikTok, supporting his bid for the presidency.
Romanian officials said TikTok failed to label posts supporting Georgescu as “politically motivated.” That laid the foundation for the populist candidate’s rise. On the other hand, his rivals’ contents were properly labeled as “politically oriented.”
For the first time in the country’s democratic history, the Romanian Constitutional Court decided to annul the runoff election when it was due to take place in about two days.
The decision came after Romanian President Klaus Iohannis declassified several intelligence documents about Georgescu’s campaign investigation. It indicated that a large part of pro-Georgescu TikTok accounts’ contents were coordinated through a Telegram channel.
The investigation also revealed that many Romanian influencers have allegedly been paid to support Georgescu’s bid. The pro-Russia candidate denied having any campaign expenses, despite Romanian law requiring that electoral campaign expenditures be declared.
One of those influencers, Bogdan Peschir, is under investigation for allegedly donating US$1 million to an account promoting Georgescu.
Moreover, one of the intelligence files revealed what the Romanian Supreme Council of National Defense denounced as the “massive exposure” of Georgescu “based on preferential treatment by TikTok.”
In essence, the social media platform allegedly contravened its own policies on elections, particularly in regards to the prohibition of “paid promotions” and “political advertising” to “avoid interfering with voters.”
That is the reason Romanian officials and the EU Commission asked TikTok to clarify which measures it was adopting to “avoid the manipulation of information” and “mitigate the risks related to elections and pluralism of media.”
The Romanian case clearly exemplifies what most European politicians and citizens are failing to understand: TikTok’s outsized power to amplify specific voices, at the expense of others, poses a grave threat to democracy.
Although the social media platform defends itself by stating that it is “not owned or controlled by Beijing, since it is a private company,” the fact that it is an app made by Chinese in China should not be overlooked.
TikTok is extremely vulnerable to Chinese Communist Party demands, as Beijing is known for using private companies serve its goals. Those can be achieved through capturing data, surveilling users, and spreading false and misleading claims with the potential to undermine democracy and national security.
With regard to goals and interests, the past two years further demonstrated the convergence between China and Russia in the geopolitical arena, especially in the context of Beijing providing Moscow with dual-use components which are identified by the US and the EU as “high priority” items necessary for Russia’s war machine.
As China and Russia further intensify their common agenda aimed at destabilizing Western societies through “interference activities,” the EU should engage with Taiwan to tackle Russia’s hybrid threat tactics by learning from its experience in dealing with China’s “digital warfare.”
The two nations’ ambition to reorganize the global order through coordinated actions, which include cybersecurity threats, information manipulation and interference activities, must be met with a firmer stance by European countries.
Romania’s case could prove beneficial in understanding what steps authoritarian countries plan to take.
As researchers Ejazul Haq Ateed and Merve Suna Ozel Ozcan said in their paper titled A New Face of China: Sharp Power Strategy and its Global Effects, China and Russia aim to expand global influence by “distracting and manipulating information, rectifying its image and undermining adversaries.”
As TikTok could be used for influence operations, EU countries must tackle the challenges it poses by joining forces with like-minded countries such as the US, Taiwan, Canada or Australia in providing a renewed framework to prevent risks to their democratic existence.
It would imply setting up policies aimed at avoiding situations such as the presidential elections in Romania, since “prevention is better than the cure.”
Michele Maresca is an analyst at the online international law journal Il Caffe Geopolitico and the think tank Geopol 21.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS