The passage of amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) marks a milestone in the country’s financial governance. After 25 years of deliberation and discussion, that legislation is now able to reshape the distribution of resources between the central and local governments, boosting local fiscal autonomy and societal resilience without impacting national defense spending.
The amendment adjusts the revenue-sharing proportions between the central and local governments. The central government is currently allocated 75 percent of national tax revenues, leaving local governments with 25 percent. This imbalance has restricted local governments’ abilities to address financial challenges effectively.
Before the 1999 streamlining of provincial governments, the revenue ratio was 60 percent central to 40 percent local.
The new law redistributes an additional NT$370 billion (US$11.26 billion) to local governments, enabling more efficient governance and reducing the need for central government micromanagement. That empowers local governments to proactively address issues with tailored solutions, marking a return to a more balanced financial framework.
Contrary to claims of inadequate communication, the legislative process involved extensive discussions. From May to November last year, the act underwent five review sessions and two public hearings. A final cross-party negotiation on Nov. 11 concluded the process. This ensured the law reflects the needs and expectations of Taiwanese while addressing long-standing grievances. It is regrettable that some critics ignore the 25 years of debate, and the numerous hearings and negotiations held during this legislative session.
The central government’s budget management has faced scrutiny due to consistent tax revenue surpluses over the past four years, averaging more than NT$400 billion annually. Those surpluses, resulting from higher-than-expected tax collections rather than additional taxation, highlight a need for more dynamic and realistic budget forecasting.
Critics say that the overly conservative approach limits opportunities to expand the budget and invest in critical sectors. While the surpluses show fiscal stability, they also reveal the potential for more ambitious fiscal policies to support infrastructure, social services and resilience initiatives.
Despite fiscal stability, some policies raise concerns about long-term financial sustainability. Chief among these is the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) energy policy, which includes moving away from nuclear power.
That decision has led to increased subsidies and NT$500 billion capital boosts for Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) over two years. Large-scale projects, such as the NT$882 billion Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program and the NT$900 billion 2050 net zero emissions plan, have also sparked debates over their financial and regional impacts.
The redistribution gives local governments a more active role in governance. Increased local funding allows for region-specific policies without relying on centralized decisionmaking. Local governments would be able to allocate funds to improve emergency services, such as police, fire departments, hospitals and civil defense infrastructure.
Critiques of the central government’s civil defense efforts reveal significant shortcomings. Ministry of the Interior data show Taiwan has more than 105,000 evacuation facilities capable of sheltering 86.55 million people. However, many are simply parking lots or government buildings, with maintenance deprioritized in favor of recordkeeping.
Shifting resources to local governments fosters a decentralized and tailored approach to building social resilience, enabling community-specific solutions to strengthen emergency preparedness. That includes improving infrastructure, increasing budgets for civil defense and disaster relief-related agencies, and enhancing equipment for critical services. By addressing these, Taiwan can ensure its fiscal policies not only support financial stability, but also enhance citizen well-being and resilience.
Concerns about the law’s impact on defense budgets are unfounded. Major procurements, such as naval and air capability upgrades or the F-16V program, are typically handled through special budgets. Claims of a possible NT$80 billion impact on the defense budget reflect mismanagement and the conservative approach to increasing the central government budget rather than an actual lack of funds. The central government’s consistent tax surpluses provide ample room to reorganize spending and expand the overall budget.
Instead of resorting to fearmongering or blaming fiscal constraints, the government should address financial challenges and reorganize spending priorities. Irresponsible rhetoric undermines public confidence and distracts from genuine efforts to resolve fiscal issues.
The passage of the amendments represents a major step forward in addressing fiscal imbalances and empowering local governments. By reallocating resources, the law reflects the public will and provides a foundation for more balanced governance. The central government should avoid spreading fear, and instead focus on solutions to reorganize and rectify avoidable spending resulting from controversial policies.
Central and local governments must collaborate closely to maximize the benefits of the reform. That includes increasing budgets for critical services, enhancing civil defense infrastructure, and improving communication between the Ministry of the Interior and local governments.
Ultimately, the law’s success depends on its implementation and the ability of both levels of government to work together toward shared goals.
Wang Kai-chun is a foreign policy advisor for the office of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS