The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) last week released the latest job vacancy data in Taiwan, which highlighted how many job openings firms had yet to be filled at the end of August last year. The data also revealed how the vacant positions were closely related to the business climate that industrial and services sectors faced at the time.
The DGBAS collects data on job vacancies at the end of February, May, August and November every year. The number of job vacancies includes recruits for expanding operations and additional production lines as well as for openings related to quitting, layoffs and retirement. However, vacant positions due to a recruitment freeze, internal recruitment and expatriate vacancies are excluded.
At the end of August last year, there were 248,036 job openings in the nation’s 17 major industries — such as manufacturing, information technology, electricity and gas supply, construction, wholesale and retail trade, transportation, accommodation and food services, financial and insurance services, real-estate, and support services. The number was the highest for the same period in three years, up 6,208 from the end of May and an increase of 3,683 from a year earlier, DGBAS data showed.
The manufacturing industry had the most job vacancies at 87,456, up 12,117 from a year earlier, due to rising labor demand related to electronic components, information technology products and emerging applications, the agency said.
Meanwhile, the wholesale and retail trade sector saw vacancies drop by 2,179 year-on-year to 39,684, the construction industry posted 4,779 fewer job openings at 15,345, and vacancies in accommodation and food services declined by 2,721 to 20,741, it added.
In terms of the job vacancy rate, which refers to the number of job openings as a percentage of employment plus job openings over a specific period, the DGBAS reported an overall job vacancy rate of 2.84 percent at the end of August, which was also the highest for the same period in three years, with the electricity and gas supply industry topping others at a rate of 4.72 percent, followed by the computer, electronics and optical products industry at 4.1 percent, and accommodation and food services at 3.7 percent.
The vacancy rate in the real-estate industry was 2.92 percent, a decrease of 0.65 percentage points from the same period last year and reaching a new low for the past 18 years, which reflected a cooling housing market due to the central bank’s selective credit control measures and resulted in a contraction in personnel demand.
As the central bank adopted a new wave of selective credit controls in September last year, how much impact its move would have on the industry’s workforce demand deserves further attention.
Observing the job vacancy rate regularly is important, because the data suggest the situation of labor demand, workforce management and the attractiveness of the job opportunities. If the rate stays high for long, it means that firms would need to find new ways to expand the workforce through attracting talent from unconventional pools, recruiting workers from abroad, offering more flexible work, encouraging people to work beyond standard retirement ages, and adopting automation or other practices to unlock productivity. In contrast, if the rate continues to remain low, it could imply that substantial market demand exists for the advertised job openings.
Overall, job vacancy rates in different industries vary and are tied to their seasonal business demand. Because the cost of vacancies is dependent on a range of factors, there is no universal formula for calculating it. However, it is worth mentioning that for firms, filling vacant positions is frequently cheaper than paying overtime, and is more conducive to enhancing performance and productivity, and maintaining customer satisfaction.
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS