The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) last week released the latest job vacancy data in Taiwan, which highlighted how many job openings firms had yet to be filled at the end of August last year. The data also revealed how the vacant positions were closely related to the business climate that industrial and services sectors faced at the time.
The DGBAS collects data on job vacancies at the end of February, May, August and November every year. The number of job vacancies includes recruits for expanding operations and additional production lines as well as for openings related to quitting, layoffs and retirement. However, vacant positions due to a recruitment freeze, internal recruitment and expatriate vacancies are excluded.
At the end of August last year, there were 248,036 job openings in the nation’s 17 major industries — such as manufacturing, information technology, electricity and gas supply, construction, wholesale and retail trade, transportation, accommodation and food services, financial and insurance services, real-estate, and support services. The number was the highest for the same period in three years, up 6,208 from the end of May and an increase of 3,683 from a year earlier, DGBAS data showed.
The manufacturing industry had the most job vacancies at 87,456, up 12,117 from a year earlier, due to rising labor demand related to electronic components, information technology products and emerging applications, the agency said.
Meanwhile, the wholesale and retail trade sector saw vacancies drop by 2,179 year-on-year to 39,684, the construction industry posted 4,779 fewer job openings at 15,345, and vacancies in accommodation and food services declined by 2,721 to 20,741, it added.
In terms of the job vacancy rate, which refers to the number of job openings as a percentage of employment plus job openings over a specific period, the DGBAS reported an overall job vacancy rate of 2.84 percent at the end of August, which was also the highest for the same period in three years, with the electricity and gas supply industry topping others at a rate of 4.72 percent, followed by the computer, electronics and optical products industry at 4.1 percent, and accommodation and food services at 3.7 percent.
The vacancy rate in the real-estate industry was 2.92 percent, a decrease of 0.65 percentage points from the same period last year and reaching a new low for the past 18 years, which reflected a cooling housing market due to the central bank’s selective credit control measures and resulted in a contraction in personnel demand.
As the central bank adopted a new wave of selective credit controls in September last year, how much impact its move would have on the industry’s workforce demand deserves further attention.
Observing the job vacancy rate regularly is important, because the data suggest the situation of labor demand, workforce management and the attractiveness of the job opportunities. If the rate stays high for long, it means that firms would need to find new ways to expand the workforce through attracting talent from unconventional pools, recruiting workers from abroad, offering more flexible work, encouraging people to work beyond standard retirement ages, and adopting automation or other practices to unlock productivity. In contrast, if the rate continues to remain low, it could imply that substantial market demand exists for the advertised job openings.
Overall, job vacancy rates in different industries vary and are tied to their seasonal business demand. Because the cost of vacancies is dependent on a range of factors, there is no universal formula for calculating it. However, it is worth mentioning that for firms, filling vacant positions is frequently cheaper than paying overtime, and is more conducive to enhancing performance and productivity, and maintaining customer satisfaction.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS