I was born in the 1960s. When I was growing up, there was no such thing as a New Year’s Eve celebration in Taiwan to mark the change from the end of the previous year to a new year in the solar calendar. New Year’s Day was celebrated as the anniversary of the founding of the Republic of China (ROC), a holiday lasting two days.
The government would often organize activities to celebrate the ROC’s founding, holding commemorative events such as flag-raising ceremonies and parades that even included the chanting of slogans to express citizens’ patriotism.
The grandest celebrations our generation attended were rallies for the limited elections organized by members of the dangwai (黨外, “outside the party”) movement, the unofficial opposition to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime, which had prohibited opposition parties during the martial law period.
Each event included massive crowds listening intently to the speakers on stage as they delivered eloquent speeches and made righteous declarations, which ignited everyone’s passion. Our zealous hearts kept us warm on those cold winter days. Whether we were on stage or off, our hearts melded together as we expressed enthusiasm for a brighter future for Taiwan.
It was not until later that the government began to hold New Year’s Eve celebrations, inviting singers to perform. Fireworks naturally became an obligatory part of the entertainment. Various counties and cities gradually began competing with one another in hosting their own lively and exciting celebrations.
Young people followed the trend, rushing to New Year’s Eve party venues to celebrate with the crowds into the early hours of New Year’s Day, which became a shared memory of these generations.
To be frank, New Year’s Eve concerts and performances are little more than a capitalist marketing tactic.
Using the arrival of the new year as an opportunity, concerts allow singers to perform and gain exposure, thereby boosting their fame so that they could sell more records and tickets. The cost of such events is staggering, often reaching millions — or tens of millions — of New Taiwan dollars.
Once the concert dies down and the excitement fades, everyone must still return to the realities of their everyday lives.
No one’s new year would be less fulfilling or wonderful if they missed a New Year’s Eve celebration. However, participation from more passionate young people is needed for societal improvement and progress.
Social engagement does not require a large sacrifice — even just small gestures suffice. Small, thoughtful actions, incrementally over time — like grains of sand building a tower or drops of water forming a river — could become the greatest driving force behind societal progress.
For the new year, one could perhaps pay closer attention to political events, sign petitions organized by civic groups, donate a few hundred New Taiwan dollars to social welfare organizations that serve the underprivileged, or take care to accompany loved ones that are experiencing hardship, thereby providing warmth during the cold winter. Each of these actions, although seemingly small, could help to cultivate a more caring and compassionate social atmosphere.
Positive and diverse forms of expression are the crucial forces uplifting society. Providing help in times of need could contribute to a brighter and more hopeful future.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017